[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Falmouth appeals board to resume hearing on town’s turbine 

Credit:  By Brent Runyon, The Enterprise, www.capenews.net 18 January 2011 ~~

Falmouth Zoning Board of Appeals on Thursday will continue hearing testimony on whether the town should shut down the municipally owned wind turbine at the wastewater treatment plant off Blacksmith Shop Road because it did not apply for a special permit.

Last month, more than 70 people filled every available seat in the meeting room at Falmouth Town Hall to witness the debate over how the local zoning bylaw should be applied to the project.

The board took the matter under advisement and continued the hearing until this Thursday, when more public testimony is expected.

Since the hearing closed, there have been several developments related to wind turbines.

The board hired an attorney, Mark Bobrowski of Concord, to advise it in the matter. Acting Chairman Dennis M. Murphy said he could not answer any questions about the board’s contact with Mr. Bobrowski.

“I’m not able to answer any questions. I’m sorry, I’m not trying to be rude, but I don’t want to do anything to jeopardize this hearing in any way,” Mr. Murphy said in response to questions on Thursday.

He said he would contact zoning administrator Sari D. Budrow to see what he could say publicly before the hearing.

Mr. Murphy is vice chairman but took over as acting chairman when Town Counsel Frank K. Duffy Jr. asked Chairman Matthew J. McNamara to step down because of comments he made in the past about the town bypassing its own permitting process.

At the first hearing, Mr. McNamara stepped down at Mr. Duffy’s request. Mr. Duffy cited comments he made at two previous joint meetings with the Falmouth Planning Board regarding wind turbine permitting. At those meetings Mr. McNamara said in his opinion the town should not have bypassed the local permitting process.

Since the first hearing, the Falmouth Planning Board took three steps toward restricting future wind turbines in town. The board voted unanimously to recommend that all land-based wind turbines be declared a district of critical planning concern on the Upper Cape.

The board also voted to bring a one-year moratoria on wind turbines to Spring Town Meeting, and to draft a more restrictive bylaw for regulating turbines.

Residents who live near the turbine have repeatedly complained about the sound the turbine makes, and they showed up in force at the first hearing.

The town-owned turbine at the wastewater treatment plant is a 1.65-megawatt Vestas turbine that is 262 feet tall at the hub.

Residents have also filed a noise complaint against the Notus Clean Energy Turbine in Falmouth Technology Park, which is the same size as the town turbine.

The appellants, Neil P. and Elizabeth L. Andersen of Blacksmith Shop Road, represented by Barnstable attorney J. Alexander Watt, argued that the board should issue a cease and desist order for the wind turbine, because the town never received the special permit required by the town bylaw.

“Wind I is a windmill. Windmills require a special permit. The town did not receive a special permit,” Mr. Watt said last month.

The town’s side was represented by Acting Town Manager Heather B. Harper, Building Commissioner Eladio R. Gore, Mr. Duffy and Town Planner Brian A. Currie, who argued that the turbine is a municipal use and therefore permitted by right, and did not require a special permit.

Source:  By Brent Runyon, The Enterprise, www.capenews.net 18 January 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon