[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Cameras on wind towers first step for security 

Credit:  BY PHYLLIS BOOTH, The Landmark, www.thelandmark.com 11 January 2011 ~~

Representatives from Video IQ will set up cameras at the wind site and videotape the area for light commissioners to review before they make a final decision regarding additional security devices at the wind farm.

Commissioners met with security company firms on Nov. 18 to discuss options for setting up security cameras in the aftermath of vandalism at the wind site in September that caused approximately $10,000 worth of damage between graffiti spray painted on one wind tower and damage to a windmill blade.

In October, commissioners talked about fencing-in the area around each of the towers and installing cameras within that space, adding an alarm to the gate to the site and installing observation cameras.

Fitch got quotes for fencing around each tower and transformer with black vinyl coated 6- to 8-foot high topped with barbed wire, for approximately $10,000 each tower. Fencing around the entire perimeter (2,300 ft.) of the wind site would cost in the range of $71,000- $85,000.

“I’m looking to see if there are any grants for critical security,” said Princeton Light Department Manager Jonathan Fitch.

David Oles from American Alarm suggested dome cameras from Video IQ based on the environment and the conditions at the site.

The cameras have built-in heaters to withstand cold temperatures in the winter and a fan that cools them in the summer, said Fitch.

The domed cameras recognize the pattern and makeup of human beings and could notify an outside source that something is going on at the site, said Oles.

“The camera can do the job of a guard and call police or a monitoring agency. The camera also can recognize vehicles,” he said.

He added that having a camera looking at the roadway and another focusing on the plateau at the north tower would cover both towers.

“We’ve only had one incident in 25 years,” said commission chairman Scott Bigelow.

“But if we put a fence around the towers, that would save $10,000 in cleanup costs,” said commissioner Brad Hubbard.

Commissioners are leaning toward domes cameras on each tower and will look at further steps in phases if necessary.

Source:  BY PHYLLIS BOOTH, The Landmark, www.thelandmark.com 11 January 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon