[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Sponsor says wind-power bill changed after proposal  

Credit:  By Erin Rhoda, Staff Writer, The Kennebec Journal, www.kjonline.com 9 January 2011 ~~

When former Sen. Peter Mills, R-Cornville, proposed the legislation that resulted in the community benefits package law, he said the goal was for Maine residents to see a reduction in power costs.

When the Natural Resources Council of Maine negotiated the bill with wind power developers, however, the bill became “much broader than anything I envisioned,” Mills said.

Because the law refers to the community benefit as both an agreement and a package, “the developer has the ability to define its own benefit,” Mills said, “in which case it may not be an agreement at all.”

“I’m a skeptic about wind power,” Mills said, describing how wind farms create just a handful of permanent full-time jobs. Developers estimate eight to 10 long-term jobs for the $210 million-to-$230 million Highland Wind project.

Wind farms also are not projected to lead to a drastic drop in Maine electricity rates, Mills said, because the power is sold to the New England grid, where it’s dispersed among many consumers.

To be successful, turbines must provide an economic benefit to people who live with them, he said. The economic benefit could be accomplished by offering cheap electric power to current businesses or by enticing new businesses to the area to create jobs.

“If we’re clever about it, we could use the wind development as a way of bringing modern jobs into these older communities and saving them,” he said.

Residents ultimately have little control over whether wind farms in Somerset County receive regulatory approval, he said, but added that “whether you hate wind turbines or you think they’re the Second Coming,” residents do have control over using the development as best they can to improve their communities.

The community benefits package is a “hugely flexible tool,” but it requires people to cooperate with developers and become knowledgeable about the financial implications, he said. “My concern is, I don’t know if we’re up to it.”

Source:  By Erin Rhoda, Staff Writer, The Kennebec Journal, www.kjonline.com 9 January 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.