LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

North Kingstown wind turbine proposal controversy 

Credit:  Reported by T.J. del Santo, WPRI, www.wpri.com 4 January 2011 ~~

North Kingstown’s planning commission meeting scheduled for Thursday night is expected to be so well attended, that it was moved to the high school. The hot topic – wind turbines.

A company called Wind Energy Development has proposed building two wind turbines in town.

The first is slated for the North Kingstown green; it’s already been approved by the town’s zoning board.

The second to be built on Stamp Farm on Rt. 2. This plan is stirring up the most debate.

It would be a 427 foot turbine. By comparison, the New England Tech turbine on I-95 is 156 feet tall.

Positioned 431 feet from the highway, some residents say this is still too close for comfort.

David Darlington, a spokesman for Wind Energy Development, says improvements have been made in the past 15 years to prevent catastrophic results from an unlikely collapse. “I understand neighbors and residents concerns over those sort of things, that’s why the town has ordinances that address all of those items.”

Robert Beatty serves on the Homeowner Association, “This is a residential community. There are houses within 500 feet of 427 tall windmill.”

Residents are also concerned about an inaudible hum which one study says can cause a number of problems including tremors, dizziness and nausea.

Wind Energy Development says that’s one study and there’s really no scientific proof that the problems exist.

Source:  Reported by T.J. del Santo, WPRI, www.wpri.com 4 January 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky