LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm developers vie for plans approval 

Credit:  By Paul Cook, The Northern Echo, www.thenorthernecho.co.uk 30 December 2010 ~~

Wind farm developers face a potential race against each other to gain approval for a town’s first site.

Two companies could be about to submit applications for separate sites to the northeast of Darlington.

It comes after one had its initial proposal for ten turbines rejected by councillors.

Darlington Borough Council’s planning committee overruled its officer’s recommendation and refused Banks Renewables’ application for ten turbines at Moor House farm.

Among their reasons, councillors believed it was contrary to a report written by independent consultants Arup, which suggested the land was suitable for more than one small to medium-small development – one of four to six turbines.

Banks Renewables said last week it was considering a new application for six turbines or lodging an appeal.

Another firm, Pure Renewable Energy, is due to submit plans for four turbines at East and West Newbiggin, following public consultation.

A Darlington Borough Council spokesman said it would look at each planning application on an individual basis as they come in.

Campaigners have asked for national guidelines to be adhered to and cited the Arup report during their protests against the first Moor House scheme.

Phil Dyke, the development director of Banks Renewables, said: “Our professional planning view is still that there is capacity for ten turbines on the site and that Moor House is still a suitable scheme for the location.”

Alan Irvine, from Pure Renewable Energy, said at a consultation event it held earlier this month: “We feel that the site for four turbines ties in with the recommendations by the Arup report.”

Peter Wood, from the campaign group Seven Parishes Action Group, called the latest application a step in the right direction.

He said national guidelines were for wind farms to be separated by at least five kilometres.

The area also faces applications for a wind farm at Mordon, near Sedgefield, and one of four turbines at Lambs Farm, Stillington.

Source:  By Paul Cook, The Northern Echo, www.thenorthernecho.co.uk 30 December 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky