[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Potential wind-power bill draws mixed reactions  

Credit:  By Ed Waters Jr., News-Post Staff, The Frederick News-Post, www.fredericknewspost.com 30 December 2010 ~~

A bill to promote offshore wind-power projects may cause it’s share of controversy during the next Maryland General Assembly session.

The proposal has the support of Sen. Robert J. Garagiola, a Montgomery County Democrat, who will be a guest speaker at an educational program on wind power in Urbana on Jan. 6.

Two other Democrats, Sen. Paul G. Pinsky of Prince George’s County and Delegate Thomas Hucker of Montgomery County, both say they will enter legislation mandate that utility companies sign long-term contracts with offshore wind-power firms to help fund those ventures.

On his website, Pinsky notes that he was involved in the Wind Vision conference held in Annapolis on Dec. 4. His bill would “require companies to seek renewable energy in their portfolios and sign long-term contracts to assure the financial viability of the cost” of such projects, Pinsky states on his website. “Delaware is committed, Maryland should be next.”

Hucker, on his website, says Maryland could create as much as two-thirds of its power needs with wind systems “and become an exporter of energy if we aggressively pursue renewable wind energy.”

The educational program, set for 7 to 8:15 p.m. Jan. 6 at Centerville Elementary School, 3601 Carriage Hill Drive, Urbana, is sponsored by the Sugarloaf Conservancy, Friends of Frederick County, Sierra Club and Montgomery Countryside Alliance. The event is free and open to the public and no registration is necessary.

“We support the legislation,” said Doug Kaplan, president of the Sugarloaf Conservancy. Kaplan’s group has been one of several grassroots organizations opposing the Potomac Appalachian Transmission Highline (PATH) project. The group said the utility companies need to consider alternative energy sources, such as wind, before building the 275-mile, $2.1 billion project across three states.

Other speakers at the Jan. 6 event will include Bob Mitchell, CEO of Trans-Elect, the Mid-Atlantic Wind Connection; Keith Harrington of Chesapeake Climate Action Network, and Lise Van Susteren of the National Wildlife Federation.

But Sen. David Brinkley, a Frederick Republican, is calling the proposed bill “a bad idea.

“It is trying to propel companies into renewable stuff. The cost will be passed on to the consumer,” Brinkley said.

Delegate-elect Patrick Hogan, also a Republican from Frederick, said the bill may go too far.

“We should encourage alternative energy, but mandating contracts with the state or between private companies might be overstepping bounds,” Hogan said.

Todd Meyers, a spokesman for Allegheny Energy, said the company won’t comment until they’ve reviewed the bill, including how it might affect rates for customers.

Brigitte Fortin, a spokeswoman for the Maryland Chapter of the Sierra Club, applauds the idea of promoting wind power.

“It is a wise move to incentivize and invest in wind power in Maryland,” she said.

Fortin said an independent study by the Abell Foundation and University of Delaware showed that offshore wind could provide 67 percent of Maryland’s electric needs.

“Compared to blowing off mountaintops in West Virginia and polluting the air, the choice is clear. Wind power will bring manufacturing jobs to Maryland, reduce our dependency on ever-diminishing fossil fuel reserves and reduce global warming,” Fortin said.

Source:  By Ed Waters Jr., News-Post Staff, The Frederick News-Post, www.fredericknewspost.com 30 December 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.