[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

If approved, wind project would be first on National Forest land 

Credit:  Susan Keese, Vermont Public Radio, www.vpr.net 24 December 2010 ~~

(Host) The Green Mountain National Forest is asking the public to weigh in on a proposed 15-turbine wind farm on national forest land in Readsboro and Searsburg.

The 30 megawatt project is being proposed by Deerfield Wind, which is owned by Iberdrola Renewables of Portland Oregon.

If approved, the 30 megawatt project would be the first utility-scale wind energy installation on national forest land anywhere in the U.S.

The installation won a certificate of Public Good, with conditions, from the Vermont Public Service Board in 2008. But it also needs approval from the forest service.

Colleen Madrid is the Green Mountain Forest Supervisor,

(Madrid) “Because the Forest Service is the Landowning Agency the forest service is the one that will allow this to happen or not. However there is no decision that’s been made internally or externally at this time. We are still collecting information and will make the best decision from that information that we can make.”

(Host) The Forest Service has just issued a Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement that details how the wind farm would affect the public lands.

One of the main concerns about the Deerfield project has been its interference with prime habitat for black bears.

Madrid says the agency is taking public comments on the plan until February 18.

(Madrid) “We’re also going to have a couple of open houses in January… where we hope if the public hasn’t written in they can come and look at the maps and talk about the alternatives and talk about what their thoughts are.”

(Host) After the public comments are factored in, Madrid, as forest supervisor, will make the final decision.

Click on link below to view the plan:


Source:  Susan Keese, Vermont Public Radio, www.vpr.net 24 December 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon