LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm setback a half mile; Residents shout down commission 

Credit:  By David Giuliani, Las Vegas Optic, 21 December 2010 ~~

Wind turbines can be as close as a half mile from a home under San Miguel County’s new law on wind farms.

Dismaying many in the audience of more than 50 people, the commission on Monday rejected a three-mile setback for turbines that a county task force had proposed.

That was the biggest issue in the task force’s proposed wind ordinance.

Commissioner Nicolas Leger proposed cutting the setback to a half mile between wind farms and homes, churches, businesses and schools. The commission quickly approved his proposal, without any discussion.

“Shame, shame,” several in the audience shouted.

“Keep your comments down,” County Manager Les Montoya warned.

Shortly after, Leger proposed changing the task force’s proposal for variances from the ordinance’s requirements. The task force allowed such a procedure for everything in the ordinance, except for the setback.

Leger, however, wanted setbacks to be subject to waivers approved by the commission.

Some in the audience protested that such a change would effectively eliminate the setback.

Commission Chairman David Salazar agreed, and the commission, including Leger, decided to keep the provision for the waivers as is.

Another big issue was the noise created by turbines. The commissioners struck several provisions dealing with the decibel levels. They replaced them with a requirement to get an independent expert to examine noise issues for each project.

Some in the audience didn’t like that, with one person saying, “If you eliminate that, you don’t protect anyone. You’ll keep people sleepless.”

In early 2009, the county formed the task force to develop new rules for wind turbines after Chicago-based Invenergy expressed interest in a 50-turbine wind farm on the Bernal Mesa in the Valley area.

Representatives of the company have attended most of the county hearings dealing with wind turbines. They were at Monday’s meeting as well. A few times, when wind-farm opponents piped in with comments, Invenergy officials responded that public comment was over.

Invenergy had recommended a setback from homes of 1,500 feet, a little more than a quarter mile. The company said the three-mile setback would have shut out wind development from the county.

After the meeting, Mark Jacobson, business development director for Invenergy, said his company would reflect on the changes before commenting.

“I won’t make any blanket statements about whether it (ordinance) is workable,” he said.

Esteban Muldavin, who has a home in Ribera, loudly ripped up a large sign that he had posted on the commission’s chambers back wall, reading, “Give us three miles. Protect Our Families and Property.”

“They (county) didn’t do a true independent economic analysis,” he said as he was walking out.

He said the wind turbines would badly affect the Valley’s scenic beauty, which he said helps the area’s economy. He said retirees add much to the economy and may not come to the Valley if the Invenergy project happens.

“No one will want to live under the wind farm,” he said.

Source:  By David Giuliani, Las Vegas Optic, 21 December 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky