News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Windy debate  

Credit:  Milwaukee News Buzz, www.milwaukeenewsbuzz.com 15 December 2010 ~~

The Wisconsin Public Service Commission has revised its proposed setback rules for wind turbines in the state yet again. Debate over the rules raged this summer between agricultural, real estate and local government officials who sought larger setbacks and renewable energy groups and energy companies that wanted to limit them.

In 2009, the state Legislature passed a law requiring the turbine siting rules, which were part of Gov. Jim Doyle’s clean energy agenda. Proponents argued the law would prevent restrictive local laws that inhibit the development of renewable energy in the state. Local governments can adopt rules that are more permissive – but not more restrictive than the state ones.

The rules originally proposed by the PSC, guided by an advisory council that met this summer, were rejected by the State Senate Committee on Commerce Utilities, Energy and Rail on a 6-1 vote in late October. In a hearing before the committee, the Wisconsin Towns Association, the Wisconsin Realtors Association and the Wisconsin Potato and Vegetable Growers Association pushed for changes to the rules.

In response to the committee’s rejection, the PSC adopted a few changes to the setback rules proposed by the Realtors Association – but stopped short of implementing all those the association suggested.

The Realtors Association asked the Commission to increase the minimum setback from homes from 1.1 times the height of the turbine to 3.1 times for residences that are “nonparticipating” – not receiving lease payments from the energy company that is installing the turbine. Many rural landowners receive payments from the companies to operate turbines on their property.

The PSC put a cap on the setback, however – it can’t be more than 1,250, about a quarter of a mile – a move praised by the clean energy group Renew Wisconsin. Executive Director Michael Vickerman said in a statement, “the rule would not impose economic burdens on wind developers seeking to install newer and larger wind turbines now available in the market.”

The Commission didn’t adopt the Association’s proposal that the setback for participating homes be increased from 1.1 times to 1.5 times.

The new setback requirements would only apply to medium and large-sized turbines. Small ones would face more relaxed rules.

If neither the Senate committee nor the Assembly Committee on Energy and Utilities votes down the rules again, they take effect on Jan. 1.

Source:  Milwaukee News Buzz, www.milwaukeenewsbuzz.com 15 December 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.