[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind foes blow heat on Energy Minister  

Credit:  By Jonathan Sher, London Free Press, www.lfpress.com 13 December 2010 ~~

It was the one question many asked of Ontario Energy Minister Brad Duguid – and one he dodged for the better part of an hour.

During a live chat on lfpress.com, Duguid was asked again and again by readers if he’d be willing to live next to wind turbines of the sort he is pushing across the province.

The question was asked so often it was raised a few more times by the live chat moderator, city editor Greg Van Moorsel.

But while Duguid wrote much about the benefits of wind power – more than 600 words over the course of 11 responses – he wrote nothing of whether he personally would be willing to live next to a turbine.

That led to much frustration among some readers who accused Duguid of ignoring concerns and simply repeating the exact same phrases he uses whenever he defends wind power and Ontario’s Green Energy Act.

“(The minister) can’t speak without cue cards,” wrote Maureen Anderson, an organizer of an umbrella organization representing dozens of anti-wind groups across Ontario, Wind Concerns Ontario.

It was the head of Wind Concerns Ontario, John Laforet, who joined Duguid in a live chat in which readers could write questions and comments.

The event generated so many responses that only a fraction could be posted in the chat.

While most who posted were opposed to wind energy, the split was closer among those who watched the chat and replied to online questions about wind power.

What was bracingly clear was this: Those on both sides of the debate believe wind power will be a force in the next Ontario election in Oct. 2010, with 84% responding to an online question saying turbines would affect how they voted.

[rest of article available at source]

Source:  By Jonathan Sher, London Free Press, www.lfpress.com 13 December 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.