[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Massachusetts business group appeals Cape Wind power purchase agreement 

Credit:  Lisa Woods, Platts, www.platts.com 13 December 2010 ~~

A Massahusetts business group on Monday appealed a power purchase agreement between National Grid and the 130-turbine Cape Wind that state regulators approved last month.

The Associated Industries of Massachusetts, which represents about 6,000 businesses in the state, argues in a brief filed before the state Supreme Judicial Court that the contract between the utility and offshore wind farm is too expensive and the costs are wrongly allocated to all distribution customers, including those who buy supply competitively.

The business group argues that National Grid should have put the contract out to bid and opened it to out-of-state developers. In addition, it argues that the deal exceeds state limits on how much power a utility can buy under long-term contracts.

Under the PPA, National Grid would buy half of Cape Wind’s output at 18.7 cents/kWh with a 3.5% annual escalator over 15 years. The cost does not include a 4% fee the utility receives for signing the contract, AIM said.

The Department of Public Utilities acknowledged when it approved the contract November 22 that Cape Wind’s power is expensive, but DPU said the projects’ benefits exceed its costs.

The Nantucket Sound project, is in the public interest, because no other renewable resource in the region matches Cape Wind in terms of size, proximity to large power load, capacity factor and the advanced stage of permitting, the DPU said.

The project also is expected to help the state meet its renewable portfolio standard.

In raising the issue of seeking out-of-state bidders, AIM echoes commerce clause challenges that TransCanada brought against other long-term deals that utilities in Massachusetts and Rhode Island made.

AIM emphasized it does not oppose Cape Wind because of is location, nor has it challenged any of the project’s permits, but the group said Cape Wind’s power is priced at three times the market price for electricity and twice the cost of any other source of renewable power.

Source:  Lisa Woods, Platts, www.platts.com 13 December 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky