[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Group challenges wind power deal 

Credit:  By Steve LeBlanc, Associated Press, www.boston.com 14 December 2010 ~~

A Massachusetts business group has asked Massachusetts’ highest court to set aside the state’s approval of the power-purchase deal between the Cape Wind project and the utility National Grid.

The 6,000-member Associated Industries of Massachusetts said in a statement yesterday that the Department of Public Utilities overstepped its powers and set a dangerous precedent for allowing utilities to negotiate agreements outside the competitive bidding process when it approved the deal last month.

In its appeal, the business group, known as AIM, contends that the approval of the National Grid/Cape Wind deal by state regulators was “arbitrary, capricious,’’ and an “abuse of discretion and not otherwise in accordance with the law.’’

The group also said the agreement will drive up electricity rates.

“AIM believes the agreement sets a dangerous precedent for allowing utilities to negotiate expensive power agreements outside of the competitive bidding process and to allocate the costs of those contracts unfairly to commercial and industrial customers,’’ the group said in a statement.

Cape Wind spokesman Mark Rodgers said the company is confident the contract will “withstand any legal challenge.’’ He said the project will prove to be an economic boon for the state.

“Cape Wind will create over a thousand new jobs in Massachusetts and contribute to greater energy diversity and reliability of our state’s energy supply while reducing dependence on imported energy,’’ Rodgers said in a statement.

AIM also argued that the amount of power purchased through the agreement exceeds 3 percent of National Grid’s load. It said that is a violation of the state’s Green Communities Act, which limits long-term contracts to 3 percent of a utility’s total electricity load.

The Cape Wind contract represents 3.5 percent of National Grid’s load, according to AIM, which said lowering the contract to 3 percent would save ratepayers millions.

A spokeswoman for National Grid also predicted the contract will survive the legal process.

“We have said repeatedly that we cannot let this project pass us by if we are to take seriously the renewable energy requirements set forth in Massachusetts and the region at large,’’ said National Grid spokeswoman Jackie Barry.

Robert Keough, spokesman for the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs, which oversees the Department of Public Utilities, said the offshore wind farm is one of the most-litigated projects in the state’s history, including five lawsuits filed by the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, which opposes the project.

“These appeals were entirely to be expected,’’ Keough said. “But all the issues raised in the appeals were exhaustively considered in the DPU proceeding, and we fully expect the Department’s actions to be upheld.’’

The state endorsed the deal between National Grid and Cape Wind, a 130-turbine wind farm planned for Nantucket Sound.

National Grid has agreed to buy half of Cape Wind’s power, beginning in 2013 when developers expect to begin producing power.

The starting price is 18.7 cents per kilowatt hour – about double today’s price of power from conventional sources – and increases 3.5 percent per year for the life of the contract. That charge covers electricity, capacity, and renewable energy attributes.

Cape Wind foes have argued that the cost is too high and would be a huge drag on local businesses.

They have also said there is plenty of cheaper alternative energy, such as land-based wind, that could better help the utility meet its obligations under Massachusetts law to get 15 percent of its power from renewable sources by 2020.

[rest of article available at source]

Source:  By Steve LeBlanc, Associated Press, www.boston.com 14 December 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky