| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
PUC ruling favors wind line changes
Credit: www.fredericksburgstandard.com 8 December 2010 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
What may perhaps be an early Christmas present for opponents of wind transmission lines in the Hill Country came Dec. 1 as the Public Utility Commissioners (PUC) in Austin ruled on a plan to replace some proposed lines with cost-effective and less intrusive alternatives.
The order commissioners signed replaces the proposed Gillespie-to-Newton (near Lampasas) and (Comfort) Kendall-to-Gillespie Competitive Renewable Energy Zones (CREZ) lines with 64 miles of alternative lines.
Substituted will be reconductored or reconstructed areas including:
•Seven miles of circuit between Killeen and Killeen Elm in Bell County,
•40 miles between Kendall and Miller Creek in Blanco County, and,
•17 miles between Miller Creek and Paleface in Travis County.
•Also, additional autotransformer capacity will be added at Kendall.
Any motion for a rehearing must be filed within 20 days of the order.
These alternative projects are due to be completed by Dec. 31, 2013.
For more on this story, read this week’s print and online editions of the Fredericksburg Standard-Radio Post.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=44385 ]
