[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Commissioner: 3-mile turbine buffer is too much  

Credit:  The Associated Press, www.washingtonpost.com 8 December 2010 ~~

LAS VEGAS, N.M. – A San Miguel County task force has proposed requiring a three-mile distance between homes and wind farms, but a county commissioner is concerned that such a large gap could discourage the industry from building in the area.

County Commissioner Nicholas Leger said Monday he supports a shorter distance but hasn’t determined what that would be.

“You basically would be banning wind development. I don’t think that’s what we as a county want to do,” Leger said.

The issue has been debated at public hearings as a Chicago-based company, Invenergy, considers whether to build a wind farm with dozens of turbines on Bernal mesa. The county is drafting a new wind ordinance that will replace a 2003 rule.

Bill Madison, owner of Madison Vineyards and Winery and a critic of wind-farm development in the Bernal area, said no one there opposes wind energy but that the towers would lower property values and create unwanted noise. He also said voters should decide the issue, not commissioners.

“If they moved them 15 miles south, where there is better wind, there would be no problem,” Madison said.

Invenergy has recommended a 1,500-foot buffer, which is a little more than a quarter mile.

When the task force formed more than a year and a half ago, it first suggested an eight-mile setback distance. After that, county officials changed the makeup of the panel to include more wind-farm supporters and the proposed three-mile setback was suggested.

Leger said everyone needs to contribute to efforts to make the United States more energy independent, and he believes alternative energy such as wind farms are a key component.

But he said he’s not endorsing any wind farm plan, and suggested that each should be evaluated individually.

Information from: Las Vegas Optic,http://www.lasvegasoptic.com

Source:  The Associated Press, www.washingtonpost.com 8 December 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.