[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Stearns should look to Denmark on wind  

Credit:  St Cloud Times, www.sctimes.com 4 December 2010 ~~

As Stearns County considers the Paynesville-area wind project, consider this:

Denmark is the poster country for wind energy, with more per capita turbines than any nation. Government-backed Dong Energy, producer of more than half of Denmark’s electricity, has announced a moratorium on new land-based turbines. Massive protests are the cause.

The primary issue is noise. A setback of at least 1 mile, the recommendation of the World Health Organization, is needed for relief from the turbine’s repetitive low-frequency sound. For Stearns County, the offer of Geronimo Wind to provide a 1,000-foot setback from homes may not soothe nearby residents.

Also, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas reported on Aug. 23 that it set a new electricity demand record with 65,776 megawatts between 4 and 5 p.m. ERCOT also reported that its 9,319 MW of name plate wind capacity produced an actual 650 MW during that period, or 1 percent of demand. This is consistent with ERCOT’s report for all of 2009, when Texas wind operated at 8.7 percent of name plate capacity and provided 1 percent of total demand. …

In the U.S. in 2009, wind produced 70 billion kwh at a 26 percent capacity factor, which provided 1.75 percent of total U.S. electric power.

At the same average capacity factor, the 95 MW Geronimo wind farm proposed near Paynesville would provide actual output of an unpredictable 25 MW. Wind turns itself on and off. The Monticello nuclear plant produces more than 20 times that output at a predictable time.

There is a role for wind energy in our electric future, but it is a supplement, not a substitute, requiring very large taxpayer subsidies. Wind is not a solution to our oil imports. … The substitute for polluting coal is reliable natural gas and nuclear energy.

By Rolf E. Westgard,
St. Paul,
member Geological Society of America

Source:  St Cloud Times, www.sctimes.com 4 December 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.