[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

We need to know more before pushing wind projects 

Credit:  By Peter D. Fox, Great Falls Tribune, www.greatfallstribune.com 2 December 2010 ~~

As a state whose economic well-being is tied to development and management of its energy resources – coal, natural gas, hydroelectric power – should Montana have a plan for harnessing its wind?

That’s a question many people in Park and Sweet Grass counties are raising as more information slowly emerges about two proposed wind projects along the Yellowstone River Valley between Big Timber and Livingston.

Details about the two projects – one in the eastern Park County, the other in western Sweet Grass County – are not easy to come by. Newspapers have reported on them in varying detail, but it is safe to say there has been much more public concern generated than confidence.

Spanish-owned Enerfin has proposed the Coyote Wind project just north of the Yellowstone near Springdale in Park County. It is proposed for 44-turbines anchored by eight machines on a section of state trust land, with the other 38 sited on privately held land. Adjoining neighbors have filed suit against the state Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, contesting the state-approved final environmental impact statement for Coyote Wind.

We learned this summer of the planned Mission Creek Wind Project of 8 to 11 turbines on private land just south of I-90 and west of Mission Creek Road. This effort is led by Sagebrush Energy, an investment group based in Jackson, Wyo.

(In both cases, the proposed turbine towers are 262 feet tall; the blade tip at its highest rotation extends more than 400 feet above the ground. Other regional projects include a Sagebrush Energy plan for a Norris Hill development and a German proposal for up to 132 turbines straddling the Sweet Grass-Stillwater county line.)

Proponents’ pushback to those who question local wind power from is to invoke the “NIMBY” accusation (“not in my backyard). Primary proponents are investors, those hired by investors, and property owners who would receive lease payments from exercising their personal property rights by doing what they want on their own land.

While there are some locals whose home would actually be in the shadow of these towers and who fear for their own quality of life – if not sanity – the bigger issues are how these projects would be managed into the future and whether they set the stage for additional wind farms.

A representative of one project told me the other day, “If it isn’t us then it will be someone else.”

That’s exactly the point. Can and should Montana develop a strategic plan that reflects the predictability factors valued so highly by investors? The policy posted on the Montana Department of Commerce website is long on prose but short on specifics.

With Montana per capita income and total personal income dramatically trailing even national averages, no one can argue the need for more and better-paying jobs.

As in virtually everything in life, for every positive there is a negative. If development of Montana’s wind resources is the positive, then what can be done to mitigate the negative? I believe we have the ability to develop sustainable public policy that affords predictability to this significant economic potential.

Meanwhile, those behind both Coyote Wind and Mission Creek insist they would be good neighbors and are genuinely interested in the local communities.

But it is near-certain that through reassignment rights the developer would cash out and a new owner would take over.

I’m not condemning these projects because the information simply isn’t available now to determine whether the greater good is to build them. But I do believe that to this point, they’ve done the absolute bare minimum to explain themselves to the community.

Montana deserves better. And Montana can do better for itself.

Peter D. Fox lives and works in the Shields River Valley north of Livingston.

Source:  By Peter D. Fox, Great Falls Tribune, www.greatfallstribune.com 2 December 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky