| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Purbeck planners agree in principle to four-turbine farm at East Stoke
Credit: By James Durkin, Daily Echo, www.bournemouthecho.co.uk 1 December 2010 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Planning chiefs have agreed in principle to allow a four-turbine wind farm to be built in Purbeck.
Members of Purbeck District Council’s planning board decided to allow green energy company Infinergy to press ahead with their £14m project at Master’s Quarry, East Stoke, subject to as yet, unspecified conditions.
These conditions, likely to be in relation to the noise made by the four 125-metre turbines, will be thrashed out at a future meeting.
Councillors made their landmark decision after listening to more than 40 representations from anti-wind farm groups, pro-wind farm environmentalists, members of the public and a ten-minute address by Infinergy chief executive officer Charles Sandham.
Speaking at the meeting, held last night at The Purbeck School, Wareham, Mr Sandham said: “Most questions here tonight have been about fear of the unknown. When built, wind farms settle comfortably with little objections.”
Responding to direct criticism from the anti-wind farm lobby, Mr Sandham stressed the wind farm would receive no subsidies, adding: “If the wind doesn’t blow, the wind farm receives no revenue.”
Directing his comments to the planning board he said: “I commend this application and ask that you don’t fear the unknown.”
Earlier, council members heard strong representations from groups opposed to the wind farm.
Terry Stewart, of the Campaign to Protect Rural England, said: “There is a threat to human health.”
He told the board similar wind farms in Scotland have to be built at least 2km from residential properties – a regulation dismissed as incorrect by Mr Sandham.
Noting the neighbouring scout camp, Mr Stewart stressed: “The turbines should be eight times as far away.
“The Purbeck Residential Care Home is only 900 metres from the turbines.
“I would ask that you reject the application.”
Of the 733 responses collected by the district council ahead of the meeting, 544 favoured the farm while 179 were against.
However, a 1,100 signature petition, opposing the proposals, had also been lodged with planning officers.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=44141 ]
