LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Sister wind farm noise level appeal 

Credit:  ALEANDRA WEAVER, The Standard, www.standard.net.au 30 November 2010 ~~

A new chapter could be written in the saga that is The Sisters wind farm if another appeal against the project’s permit refusal goes ahead.

Proponent Wind Farm Developments went to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) in April this year after an application for its 12-turbine project near Terang was rejected by Moyne Shire.

VCAT upheld the project’s rejection due to the noise it was likely to generate but said turbines would not disrupt farming activity or wildlife.

This decision was appealed by Wind Farm Developments, which recently took its case to the Supreme Court.

Moyne Shire strategic planning manager Russell Guest said discussion during the latest hearing centred on the noise standard used by VCAT to assess the wind farm’s impacts.

“There are a set of guidelines that everybody in Victoria has to use to assess any application for a wind farm; in those guidelines it says you measure noise using the New Zealand standard (1998),” he said.

“In March this year they brought out a new one known as the New Zealand standard 2010.”

VCAT upheld Moyne Shire’s permit refusal on the grounds the wind farm would not satisfy the latest standard, though Wind Farm Developments argued its application should have been assessed against the older criteria.

“The problem is that the 2010 (standard) isn’t referred to in the planning guidelines, so that was the legal challenge,” Mr Guest said.

“(Lawyers for) both parties – the wind farm developer and the council – upon considering the likely outcome, came to the agreement that VCAT had got it wrong and that the technical challenge would succeed.”

The 2010 New Zealand standard retains the 1998 version’s noise limits but also introduces a stricter limit where planning authorities identify the need for “a higher degree of protection of acoustic amenity”.

Wind Farm Developments asked that the matter return to VCAT and be heard by a new panel, with Moyne Shire requesting that the only issues considered be the wind farm’s noise and the impact of additional turbines at the nearby Mortlake South project.

Associate Justice Melissa Daly is now considering the request.

“(Ms Daly) has looked at the agreement to go back to VCAT and she has to agree that that’s the right thing to do,” Mr Guest said.

“Once it was apparent that the lawyers agreed there was a legal, technical error, then there was no point in pushing ahead with a full challenge – it’s just going to waste time and money.”

Mr Guest said the shire still believed it had a solid case for refusing a permit for The Sisters, particularly given the proximity of the Mortlake South project.

“Hopefully the earliest date (for a resolution) would be February or March next year, but it might be longer,” he said.

Source:  ALEANDRA WEAVER, The Standard, www.standard.net.au 30 November 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky