[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Squaring the circle  

Credit:  By Boston Herald Editorial Staff, www.bostonherald.com 24 November 2010 ~~

There is a certain circular logic to be found in this week’s approval by state regulators of the Cape Wind power-purchase deal.

The major benefit of the 15-year contract, the Department of Public Utilities spells out in its decision, is that it will help National Grid and the state meet minimum mandatory requirements for securing energy from renewable sources. Under the contract National Grid will purchase half of Cape Wind’s energy output.

“This contract fulfills a statutory mandate under the Green Communities Act to facilitate the development of renewable energy generation, and it does so with strong protections for ratepayers,” DPU Chair Ann Berwick said in a statement.

Of course, that “statutory mandate,” signed into law by Cape Wind supporter Gov. Deval Patrick in 2008, was worded in a way that essentially greased the skids for Cape Wind, and now the project is rolling right along its intended path.

Gee, don’t you just love it when a plan comes together?

The DPU also touted the “cost-effectiveness” of the deal, and said the above-market costs are justified by its “significant and unique” benefits. While the cost to all electricity ratepayers could eventually reach $1.4 billion over 15 years, supporters including Patrick have cited the “$1.50 per month” impact on residential bills.

But as the Herald has previously reported, that “cup of coffee” analogy wilts upon closer scrutiny. A small grocer would see his electric bill rise by $100 a month. A suburban hospital would face a $1,200 monthly increase and one school district would likely take an annual $9,480 hit.

When workers at those places begin filing for unemployment, the Patrick administration should remind them of the “significant and unique” benefits of the wind deal.

Let’s face it, Beacon Hill made National Grid and other utilities an offer they couldn’t refuse, Cape Wind investors secured a suitor for their astonishingly high-cost product and Patrick has polished his credentials with the environmental set.

Meanwhile the ratepayers are left holding one mighty expensive bag.

Source:  By Boston Herald Editorial Staff, www.bostonherald.com 24 November 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.