LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Backing for ‘dominating’ turbines near Turriff 

Credit:  The Press and Journal, www.pressandjournal.co.uk 17 November 2010 ~~

Plans to build three wind turbines on the edge of a north-east town moved a step closer yesterday despite being labelled “overbearing and dominating” by planners.

Clean energy company Green Cat Renewables hopes to build the 328ft structures at Shielburn Farm, Newton of Fortrie, near Turriff.

Its application was backed yesterday by members of the Formartine committee, who referred it to Aberdeenshire Council’s infrastructure services committee (ISC) for approval.

Turriff and district councillor Sandy Duncan said the site appeared to be poor agricultural land and the impact on the landscape would be minimal.

He added: “To me it seems like an ideal site for these turbines.”

Fellow Turriff councillor Anne Robertson echoed his comments, saying the proposed location for the turbines was appropriate.

“I would be minded to support it and grant this application,” she said.

Councillors backed the project unanimously, but agreed to refer the application to the ISC, which will consider it in due course.

In a report that went before the committee yesterday, officials had recommended councillors refuse planning permission for the scheme.

It was revealed that the project has attracted six letters in support, six against and a 21-name petition backing the proposal.

Concerns raised include increased noise as a result of the turbines, their proximity to neighbouring houses and lack of financial benefit to the area.

However, the scheme’s supporters say the turbines, which would be capable of supplying power to 3,900 homes, would reduce the region’s carbon footprint and benefit the environment.

Planning official and report author Victoria Moore had said: “The size of the wind turbines proposed for the application site is too tall for the landscape character and identified sensitivity of the area.

“For reasons of their scale the turbines are likely to detract from the visual quality and character of the designated landscape and therefore refusal of this application is recommended.”

Source:  The Press and Journal, www.pressandjournal.co.uk 17 November 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky