[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Residents air pros, cons of wind farms; Proposal would erect 24 turbines 

Credit:  By Matthew Spolar / Monitor staff, Concord Monitor, www.concordmonitor.com 5 November 2010 ~~

Members of the public sounded off on a proposed wind farm in Groton yesterday during a weeklong stretch of hearings before the state decides whether to approve the project next month.

The proposed 24-turbine farm, built by Spanish firm Iberdrola Renewables Inc., would be situated along the Fletcher and Tenney mountain ridges near Plymouth. In June, about 100 people showed up at a public hearing on the project at Plymouth State University.

The public attendance at yesterday’s Site Evaluation Committee hearing in Concord was much smaller, featuring a handful of speakers. The deadline for the 15-member committee to approve the project is Dec. 22.

Kevin Onnela, who owns the property in Lempster where Iberdrola built its first wind farm in New Hampshire, spoke in support of the Groton project.

“In our town, we have discovered that wind farms are good neighbors,” said Onnela, who leases his land to Iberdrola.

Gregg Pitman, the executive director of the New Hampshire Campground Owners Association, spoke against the potential noise caused by the turbines on behalf of Cheryl and Rick Lewis, who own Baker River Campground about 1.25 miles from the proposed site of the 400-foot turbines.

“They are very concerned about the future of their campground that serves a lot of tent campers who come for the peace and quiet of the New Hampshire countryside,” he said. “How will the abutters be reimbursed should there be a detrimental effect upon their businesses?”

Cathy and Norm Sturgeon opened a general store in Lempster as the turbines were being built there. Cathy Sturgeon said daily business from the construction crew gave the store “the boost that it needed to get going in such a small town.”

“To this day, it still generates business for us,” Sturgeon said. “We have people come in on a weekly basis: They inquire about the wind turbines, they spend money in our store.”

The Mazur family of Rumney, which neighbors Groton, testified as intervenors in opposition to the project.

Lawrence Mazur had raised health concerns about Wind Turbine Syndrome, a term used by a New York pediatrician to describe a constellation of symptoms – like headaches and nausea – reported by residents living near a wind farm.

“It’s not clear in my mind whether this is a reasonable health issue of concern or not,” Mazur said. However, Mazur implored the board to further investigate the potential health effects of the turbines before approving the project.

Mazur’s wife, Christine, said that from the couple’s bedroom, they can see the mountain ridges on which the turbines are planned.

“We’re going to have a grand view of the project,” she said.

Pamela Hamel, the administrative assistant in Groton’s town office, said she supports the wind farm while acknowledging its local impact.

“Is it right for us to expect to use our cell phones, turn on our lights, drive our cars, boats or snowmobiles, cook our meals . . . and somehow not be impacted by the production of the energy that it takes to use those things?” she said.

Project manager Ed Cherian estimates the Groton turbines will produce, on average, enough energy for about 20,000 households.

Miles Sinclair, the chairman of the Groton selectmen, said the “vast majority” of people he’s spoken with in town support the project because they recognize the importance of breaking the country’s dependence on foreign oil.

“I think it’s been a very thorough process,” Sinclair said of the state hearings. “Maybe even overly so.”

The hearings resume today and may continue into next week after a late filing by Iberdrola proposing an alternate path for the power lines running from the wind farm to the PSNH power grid. The company received complaints that the original proposal ran too close to a road.

Additionally, the state Division of Historical Resources has rejected a submission from Iberdrola that attempted to address the project’s impact on the historical aspects of the community. The submission lacked sufficient information, and a request sent to Iberdrola for a site visit was not returned, state officials said.

Cherian said he’s confident the company will be able to satisfy the Division of Historical Resources’s concerns.

Source:  By Matthew Spolar / Monitor staff, Concord Monitor, www.concordmonitor.com 5 November 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky