LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

NW voters dislike red light cameras, wind farms and name changes 

Credit:  Tom Banse, news.opb.org 3 November 2010 ~~

Northwest voters showed dislike for red light cameras and wind farms on Tuesday. Those are results from a couple of trendsetting city and county ballot measures that caught our eye.

In recent years, 34 cities in Oregon and Washington have installed automated traffic cameras to ticket red light runners.

Voters in the Seattle suburb of Mukilteo are the first in the Northwest to signify their displeasure at the polls. 70 percent voted to make the fine so low, the cameras wouldn’t pay.

Mukilteo resident Tim Eyman authored the ballot proposition.

Tim Eyman: “The impact of that local initiative is going to ripple across the state of Washington. I think every city that has red light cameras and speed cameras is wondering if they have their own little Eyman down there ready to do a local initiative.”

Elsewhere, residents of northeast Oregon sent the burgeoning wind power industry a wakeup call. Union County voters turned thumbs down on a big new wind farm in a non-binding advisory vote.

Meanwhile, residents of Detroit, Oregon have voted against change of a different sort. They nixed switching the small town’s name to Detroit Lake.

The defeated change was meant to promote tourism and reduce confusion with its larger namesake in Michigan.

Source:  Tom Banse, news.opb.org 3 November 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky