[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Absurd notion  

Credit:  The Shetland Times, www.shetlandtimes.co.uk 3 November 2010 ~~

Shetland has received the accolade of being one of the top 10 places on earth that tourists should visit to experience its unique, unspoiled, natural beauty and wildlife.

But some years ago Viking Energy published a statement that a massive windfarm in Shetland would be a tourist attraction. Such a patently absurd notion was one reason why every other statement that was published by Viking Energy should be treated with extreme caution: in particular the estimates of the costs of construction and forecasts of millions of pounds flowing effortlessly into the coffers of Shetland.

It is easy to understand the enthusiasm of a small number of individuals who might become extremely wealthy but the involvement of Scottish and Southern Energy is more complex. Put bluntly the shareholders of SSE would see an immediate benefit if the whole of Shetland was to disappear cataclysmically under the sea.

SSE is committed to supplying electricity to Shetland via the obsolete, heavily polluting and very expensive oil-fired power station which is overdue for replacement. The Viking Energy project, on which millions of pounds of Shetland money has already been spent, will not go ahead unless a connector cable is laid to the Scottish mainland.

But, if a cable is laid, then Shetland, like Orkney, would not need a power station [sic]*. The estimated cost of such a cable runs from £550 million to £1,000 million and it is not clear who is expected to foot the bill.

In the next decade thousands of wind generators are to be sited offshore around the coast of the British Isles; these will dwarf the Viking Energy project and make its output insignificant.

SSE is committed to invest and part own several of these windfarms and will be required to raise hundreds of millions, if not billions of pounds, to fund its share of the total investment.
SSE already has enormous debts in the form of bank and other loans, but will have no problem raising extra capital because the construction and operation of offshore windfarms uses proven and financially viable technology.

British ports have been allocated millions of pounds of government money to assemble the turbines before they are transported by specially designed ships and erected on the sea bed. No expensive roads will be built, there will be no disturbance of peat, no breeding birds will be disturbed, no carbon dioxide will be released into the atmosphere, no households will suffer the loss of their views, or the noise of rotating blades and migraine inducing flicker.

So why is SSE seemingly keen to proceed with a project which is relatively unimportant but undeniably harmful to the natural beauty, habitat, and wildlife of Shetland, just to produce a comparatively small amount of electricity which will be used hundreds of miles away in Scotland where large windfarms already exist?

Could it be that when a connector cable is installed it would not matter to SSE if not one penny of profit was ever made during the life-time of the turbines: SSE would immediately benefit from the fact that it would not be necessary to replace the Lerwick power station saving hundreds of millions of pounds to the benefit of its shareholders. But Shetland would have taken another huge step towards insolvency.

One of the most disturbing aspects of this matter, which is of extreme importance to all who live in Shetland and on which there are differing views, is that there will be no referendum.

Perhaps all councillors, and especially MSP Tavish Scott, convener of the economy, energy and tourism committee, who applauds the recognition of Shetland as a place of exceptional quality, will not endorse the view of Viking Energy that monstrous turbines will attract visitors to these islands.

Long ago an approaching Viking longship would cause terror as the local inhabitants knew that their community was about to suffer pain, grief and destruction. Is Viking Energy aptly named?

Allan Pring
South Voe,

Source:  The Shetland Times, www.shetlandtimes.co.uk 3 November 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.