LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Proposed NU-NSTAR merger could boost wind power, transmission 

Credit:  By Edith Tucker, www.newhampshirelakesandmountains.com 3 November 2010 ~~

The problem of how to pay for building a larger, more robust Coös Loop to transmit renewable power out of the North Country could become a non-issue.

The merger of Northeast Utilities – parent company of Public Service of New Hampshire – and NSTAR, formerly Boston Edison announced on Oct. 18 would create the 15th largest electric utility in the U. S. It’s new size could allow the utility to make significant investments in transmission facilities, both companies reported in separate but identical filings with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Both utility companies filed form 425 with the SEC on Monday morning that state that once combined they would be “larger, more diverse, and better positioned to support economic growth and renewables in New England.” Along with that statement were maps that showed possible regions in Northern New Hampshire, Vermont and Maine where the company could explore windpower and transmission of that power to southern New England.

The explanation with the accompanying map of New England, reads: “Together, NU and NSTAR would serve 50 percent of the region’s load, including important load centers in southern New England.” It would “bring best-in-class transmission developer, scale, financial strength, and combined talent to successfully develop large-scale projects to connect wind generation with load centers that complement (current) ISO-New England regional planning and potential Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) changes; create efficiencies by optimizing multiple wind sites and required transmission; get clean energy to New England’s load sites; and utilize a ‘beneficiary-pay’ model that provides transparency for both customers and regulators.”

The filings point out that

NU, NSTAR, National Grid, and United Illuminating are working collectively on this model.

A major plus of the proposed NU and NSTAR merger, the two companies say, is that the combined companies would effectively advocate projects designed to move forward current public policy goals to address climate change and the regional Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS). New England RPS are set at 21 percent by 2020, whereas existing resources now only provide 6 percent.

Next week’s meeting of the North Country Transmission Commission (NCTC) is set from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. on Tuesday, Nov. 9, under the chairmanship of Sen. Martha Fuller Clark, a Democrat of Portsmouth, in the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) offices on Fruit Street in Concord.

The agenda includes discussion of the KEMA consultant’s report on how, realistically, a $150 million investment in a new Coös Loop could be paid for and whether or not the Commission should recommend any legislation be filed for the upcoming 2011 legislative session.

The most recent NU and NSTAR filings could influence the discussion.

The proposed merger of the two utilities sprang out of the president/CEOs working together on the Northern Pass Transmission LLC.

The Northern Pass line, starting in Des Cantons, Quebec, would run to Franklin at a capital cost of $1.107 billion to be borne by Hydro-Quebec. An application filed on Oct. 14 with the federal Department of Energy (DOE) began the permitting process.

Source:  By Edith Tucker, www.newhampshirelakesandmountains.com 3 November 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky