[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Advocate: turbines not good for birds  

Credit:  By Matt McAllister, Johnson Newspapers, www.watertowndailytimes.com 3 November 2010 ~~

HAMMOND – An ornithologist told the Hammond Wind Committee on Monday night that Iberdrola Renewable’s industrial wind turbine project between Black Lake and the St. Lawrence River would be problematic for birds and bats.

William R. Evans, director of the nonprofit Old Bird Inc. in Ithaca, and Jennifer J. Caddick, executive director of Save the River, Clayton, called for a three-year moratorium on industrial wind development along the St. Lawrence River.

Based on migratory patterns of birds, the Canadian Wolfe Island wind project is the “worst sited build-out” Mr. Evans said he’s seen. He stressed the importance of placing turbines in places where their impact on native species will be minimized.

“I feel (wind developers) keep barging into sensitive areas and creating problems, and for the most part, state agencies are helpless” to stop them or to get involved at the local level, he said.

While each project is unique, a large body of water, such as the St. Lawrence River, is a prime location for flight patterns of migratory birds., Mr. Evans said. The Hammond site is particularly dangerous for birds.

Ms. Caddick told the committee the level of bird deaths near Wolfe Island has Save the River concerned about additional wind development.

“We feel much can be learned about the ecological impacts of Wolfe Island and applied to future projects,” she said.

Committee co-chairman Ronald R. Papke asked Iberdrola Renewables representatives at the meeting whether the company would share its migratory bird and bat studies. The company said the studies would be made available after the state Department of Environmental Conservation reviewed them.

The committee’s next meeting is Nov. 15.

Source:  By Matt McAllister, Johnson Newspapers, www.watertowndailytimes.com 3 November 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.