| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Martin wants public engaged in wind farm proposals
Credit: By ELAINE DELLA-MATTIA, THE SAULT STAR, www.saultstar.com 31 October 2010 ~~
Massive wind energy developments shouldn’t be established without planning and consultation by those the farms could affect, said Sault MP Tony Martin.
Martin has developed a wind energy strategy that he believes would serve areas communities and address citizens’ concerns.
“I am not opposed to renewables. We have to go there and need to go there to generate energy in the future and wind is a major part of that but we need to avoid development with little planning or consultation,” he said. “We need to get the people involved that are most affected by the decisions that are made.”
Martin has been working with Save Our Algoma Region (SOAR) over the past few moths, trying to develop a strategy that could be used to ensure the area’s needs are met with any massive wind energy developments.
Soar formed in August in response to various plans for wind development in the area, including possibly placing wind turbines in Lake Superior.
The Ontario Power Authority approved 184 large scale projects in April under its Feed-In Tariff Program, which pays developers to contribute 10 kilowats or more of renewable energy back into the provincial grid.
Contracts were offered to two projects north of the Sault including a 60,000 kW (60 megawatt) wind farm at Montreal River Harbour and a 25,000 kW Goulais Wind Farm, which Confederation Power Inc. plans to employ 10 to 16 wind turbines by 2013.
Martin wants to see all information on proposed developments be made readily available and transparent so that area communities and residents can make informed decision.
Orazietti had said the public had opportunity for feedback, including on the Environmental Registry or at Ministry of Natural Resources or Ministry of Environment offices.
Martin said he also wants to see “substantial” environmental prescreening of the projects, including studies on how the wind turbines could affect fish habitat and wetlands.
“We need to determine whether it is cost effective to have these big projects on Lake Superior or if they will negatively impact our eco tourism in Northern Ontario,” Martin said.
Area communities and First Nations should be included in the decision-making process and should get some direct benefits from any development that includes a government investment, he said.
“If you don’t engage, don’t talk to people then we’ll see the big turbines on every piece of land between here and Thunder Bay,” he said.
He also says that government needs to focus more on reducing energy consumption instead of just finding other ways to crate it.
Martin welcomes the return of the federal government’s ecoEnergy for Home Retrofit program that saw homeowners receive energy grants to improve energy efficiency in their homes.
Martin believes that the all levels of government need to develop an inventor y of suitable sites for large scale renewable power development, taking into account community input and studies on potential health, noise and environmental concerns.
SOAR and Martin will be co-hosting a second information about wind turbines on Thurs., Nov. 4 at 7 p.m. at Alexander Henry. All are welcome to attend.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=42862 ]
