[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Minnesota PUC gets the message 

Credit:  The Republican Eagle, www.republican-eagle.com 26 October 2010 ~~

Goodhue County residents and county and state officials met in St. Paul before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission Oct. 21.

Reps. Steve Drazkowski and Tim Kelly expressed concern with the cookie-cutter approach in siting huge industrial wind projects. Goodhue County is unique and has its own reasons that this type of siting does not work. They asked whether C-Bed status is being abused.

County officials were called upon to explain the very late introduction of Goodhue County’s new ordinance on wind. They explained a need for thorough and detailed work to get it right. Property value, health and safety reasons were cited.

The lawyer for AWA Goodhue Wind objected to the new ordinance requiring a 10 rotor diameter setback from non-participants. AWA Goodhue Wind stated that Goodhue County’s ordinance and objections were “parochial.”

AWA stated that the 30 percent stimulus grant was of major concern. It would appear that money, not the need for renewable energy, is a driving force behind the push to litter Goodhue County with wind turbines.

The PUC called for this case to proceed to a new administrative law judge hearing. The need for a more thorough and detailed study was cited.

PUC Commissioner O’Brian reiterated the need to slow down and take a closer look. O’Brian said the PUC was not on a time clock, but wanted substance.

Members of the PUC said it was time to take a closer look at how siting is handled or they would likely continue to face the objections of the public.

Shelly Nygaard


Source:  The Republican Eagle, www.republican-eagle.com 26 October 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky