[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Firm defends scheme for higher turbines  

Credit:  By Amanda Greaves, Telegraph and Argus, www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk 27 October 2010 ~~

The company behind controversial plans for three 80m high turbines has insisted it is the perfect site for generating wind power.

Kelda Water wants to replace four ‘worn out’ wind turbines at Chelker Reservoir, near Addingham, which are operating at a tiny percentage of their capacity.

The blades have been removed from two of the turbines and the other two are out of action.

But the plans to replace them have drawn criticism from local communities. A protest group called PACT (Parishoners Against Chelker Turbines) has been set up against the project, which has yet to be formally submitted as a planning application.

However, Mark Fox, from Kelda, a sister company to Bradford-based Yorkshire Water, insists the new turbines would operate 85 per cent of the time and generate enough electricity to power two water pumping stations.

“It was and is still an important site to us,” he said. “It’s the ideal place, where there’s very open countryside.”

It has been claimed the majority of people who visited a public exhibition in Addingham about the proposed turbines were in support of them.

“The feedback was quite generally positive,” Mr Fox said.

“People could see it’s an improvement on what’s already on the site.”

But Addingham Parish Councillor Gordon Campbell said the scheme was just a revenue stream.

“The three new ones will generate far more electricity than they need for the pumping stations, and the rest will go into the national grid, and be a revenue stream,” he said.

Kelda Water is expected to hold further consultation exercises.

Source:  By Amanda Greaves, Telegraph and Argus, www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk 27 October 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.