[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Landowners fighting power line plan near wetlands  

Credit:  Associated Press, billingsgazette.com 24 October 2010 ~~

GREAT FALLS – A group of north-central Montana landowners are fighting a state decision to allow construction work on a power transmission line to occur within 50 feet of wetlands.

The landowners, who live between Dutton and Cut Bank, argue the Department of Environmental Quality broke the law by not accepting public comment before approving a permit amendment.

Maurer Farms Inc. and Somerfeld & Sons Land and Livestock, both of Power; Larry and Shirley Salois of Cut Bank and Dutton’s Jerry McRae and Katrina Martin are filing a single appeal, represented by attorney Hertha Lund.

The DEQ’s Lisa Peterson tells the Great Falls Tribune the appeal would be on the agenda of the Board of Environmental Review meeting in December.

Tonbridge Power Inc., is building a 200-mile, high-voltage transmission line between Great Falls and Lethbridge, Alberta to carry wind energy.

The DEQ approved a permit in 2008 that said Tonbridge had to maintain a 50-foot buffer to protect wetlands.

This summer, Tonbridge sought an amended permit to allow construction activity within 50 feet of wetlands. The DEQ said it would allow such work if there were no reasonable alternatives.

The landowners’ appeal argues the DEQ released three alternatives to Tonbridge’s request to the public but didn’t choose any of them. Therefore, they argue, the DEQ’s alternative allowing the work in the wetlands was not presented for public comment, violating the Major Facilities Citing Act.

The landowners also argue wetland soils will be harmed and construction will encroach on private property if work is allowed within 50 feet of wetlands. The landowners also argue that Tonbridge sought the change primarily to make more money rather than for the public good.

Tonbridge has said that it appealed the final permit because it contained language barring any impact on wetlands, even though the environmental study did contemplate some impacts.

Tonbridge has agreed to offset any temporary disturbance by making payments to a statewide wetland mitigation fund. Permanent guy wires and structures will not be allowed in the wetlands.

The power line would cross wetlands at 37 locations, but wetlands would be dry during the construction period, according to Tonbridge. To limit the impact, it said, large oak mats would be placed on the ground for vehicles to drive on.

Larry Salois and his mother, Shirley, also are fighting a condemnation complaint that Tonbridge has filed to obtain right of way for the project. That case was heard in District Court in Cut Bank, but the judge has not ruled.

Source:  Associated Press, billingsgazette.com 24 October 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.