[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Support for moratorium expressed during wind power discussion 

Credit:  By BETTE BRITT, The Weekly Packet, www.weeklypacket.com 21 October 2010 ~~

“I am here because I believe that my town needs to create a wind power ordinance,” declared Nicole Gray as she read from a prepared statement on Thursday, October 7.

She was the first of nearly a dozen community members who spoke during a public hearing at the Sedgwick town house, and her words sparked an hour-long dialogue on the issue of wind power development in Sedgwick.

Brooksville residents will vote on November 2 on whether to enact a 180-day moratorium on such development. If approved, the moratorium would give an as-yet-to-be named panel that much time to write a town ordinance setting standards for wind power development.

“An ordinance would insure an application process that is transparent, protects the town financially and [has] a code of ethics to avoid conflicts of interest from being part of the process,” Gray said.

Those speaking in favor of a moratorium at the meeting were in the majority.

“Once towers go up, they won’t come down,” said Dennis Desilvey, who introduced himself as the town’s health officer.

Desilvey said he’s seen 450-foot wind towers in Europe, but acknowledged there are “quieter, smaller” 150-foot turbines in other places over there.

Paul Trowbridge of Peninsula Power, a volunteer community organization exploring the feasibility of harnessing wind power in Sedgwick, has said his group is neutral on the question of a moratorium.

The reason is because the time it would take his group to complete a feasibility study would most likely be longer than a moratorium would last.

At the October 7 meeting, Trowbridge said Peninsula Power aims to determine both the benefits and downside of wind power and called a town ordinance that sets standards for wind power development “a fine idea.”

Trowbridge encouraged those present to be open-minded and consider, with his group, whether wind power might help the community and the local school.

To us, Trowbridge said, it’s “a discussion, a beginning, a study….We are not First Wind or Trans-Canada.”

The process of drafting an ordinance, Trowbridge said, would give the town an opportunity to learn about the benefits of wind power as well as its perceived problems, like noise.

Some voiced outright opposition to the notion of harnessing wind power in the town.

Claiming Maine already produces more electricity than it needs, Peter Douvarjo said the town doesn’t need to generate electricity. “We’d end up paying for it – and no one in Sedgwick is going to benefit from it,” he said.

“It doesn’t belong in a small town,” another man said, mentioning problems that he said are experienced by “regular folks” who live on Vinalhaven. “No one wants to live near them.”

Peter Neall said noise level has to be considered for a greater distance than is often described and that the presence of towers devalues land.

Desilvey urged those who might be charged with writing a wind tower ordinance to carefully consider size, scale, noise level and anything else that will be affected when setting standards for a wind farm in Sedgwick.

An ordinance should set maximum standards, Desilvey said, and he urged those who will write the ordinance to “write something that will protect us.”

Source:  By BETTE BRITT, The Weekly Packet, www.weeklypacket.com 21 October 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky