LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Norwell: ZBA rejects wind tower proposal 

Credit:  By John Penny, 95.9 WATD, www.959watd.com 21 October 2010 ~~

The Norwell zoning board of appeals has said no to the installation of a 200-foot wind tower at 342 Mount Blue Street.

The board unanimously voted against Mount Blue Farm owner Bruce Meacham’s proposal for a special permit in a residential zone to build the temporary wind tower, to see if there’s enough wind for the construction of one or maybe two full blown wind turbines.

ZBA chair Lois Barbour summarized the reasons for the board’s decision, saying, “This would be detrimental to the neighborhood and is not currently an allowed use. It would significantly alter the character of the zoning district, which does not allow commercial enterprises, accept permitted accessory uses. It would be offensive to the neighborhood by reason of increased noise and visual disruption of the natural landscape.There may be other potential causes, not determined at this time.”

Meacham claims the tower should be permitted under the zoning by–law as an accessory scientific use, since it will determine the viability of building a wind turbine. But ZBA member Philip Brown disagrees.

“My opinion is that this is not an accessory scientific use, under the terms of our by-law. It’s not something that’s permitted as a matter of right. I’m not sure the proposed tower falls within scientific research or scientific development of related production, so I don’t think we could grant it,” said Brown.

Meacham says he hasn’t decided if he will appeal. An employee of WATD also lives in the neighborhood of the proposed wind tower.

Source:  By John Penny, 95.9 WATD, www.959watd.com 21 October 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky