LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Somerset County officials hear wind proposal 

Credit:  By Erin Rhoda, Staff Writer, Morning Sentinel, www.onlinesentinel.com 21 October 2010 ~~

SKOWHEGAN – A wind development project that could stretch 50 turbines from Bingham through Mayfield Township could create six to 12 long-term, full-time jobs.

And, a plan for a tax-increment financing district, to capture increases in property values in the project area on unorganized territory land, could be flexible.

Somerset County Commissioners listened to Joan Fortin, a Bernstein Shur attorney for First Wind, on Wednesday night as she explained the economic benefit of a wind project that proposes the installation of 32 turbines in Mayfield.

Residents of nearby towns and townships, however, questioned the economic benefit and cautioned that the project would come at the expense of people’s health, the landscape and the abundance of animals.

Commissioners ultimately voted unanimously to look into hiring a consultant, paid for by First Wind, to look into the pros and cons of a tax-increment financing (TIF) district.

Because Mayfield is an unorganized territory, a TIF district there, which would potentially encompass $150 million of property, would split increases in property value between the county and First Wind, a Boston-based company also responsible for Stetson Wind in Washington County.

The money captured by the TIF district would have to be used for economic development projects in the unorganized territories.

While the TIF district could capture 100 percent of the property value increase, and then split it, with 30 percent going to the county and 70 percent going to First Wind, that arrangement could be altered, Fortin said.

The TIF district could capture just 90 percent of the property value increase, or 75 percent, and then divide it between the county and First Wind appropriately. The remaining money that wasn’t captured in the TIF fund would revert to the state in new taxes.

“The point is to show the flexibility of the TIF program,” Fortin said. “Our goal is to have a dialogue, not to push you to do something you don’t want.”

Attendees questioned whether creating a TIF district would be beneficial for the county or just a tax break for First Wind.

“There’s nothing green about industrial, commercial wind,” said Jack Flynn, of Bingham. “It’s a tax haven for the wealthy.”

“Apparently they’re here because we have the best wind in the state, so that’s something to keep in mind. There’s not a lot of places they can go,” said Jay Staton, of Highland Plantation.

David Miller, of Lexington Township, said that full- and part-time jobs would be created at the expense of already existing jobs.

“The fact is you’re going to lose a lot of employment in the county, too,” he said, referring to wilderness-related jobs, such as guiding.

He said it is important to also consider the impact that the construction of roads and turbine sites would have on fish. Construction can impact streams that feed into salmon and brook trout waters, he said.

Margy Flynn of Bingham said, “We really haven’t heard any open discussion about the health implications.” She said turbines six miles away can cause loss of sleep, rapid heartbeat, depression, anxiety and feelings of helplessness.

Commissioners reminded residents that they have no control over the permitting process, which will be completed by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection.

Source:  By Erin Rhoda, Staff Writer, Morning Sentinel, www.onlinesentinel.com 21 October 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky