[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Resident denied variance to build 93-foot-tall wind turbine 

Credit:  By Carole Duran, Reading Eagle correspondent, readingeagle.com 20 October 2010 ~~

A South Heidelberg Township resident was denied a variance Tuesday to construct a 93-foot-tall wind turbine on his property.

Bret T. Cadmus had proposed building the turbine on his 1.5-acre lot off Homestead Lane in the Stone Hedge development.

The maximum building height in the township is 35 feet in a residential district. Cadmus asked the zoning hearing board for a variance to extend that height to 93 feet.

Cadmus wanted to generate his own electricity and said he would not sell power to utility companies. He said his plan was to build credits for power instead of selling energy back to the grid.

Neighbors Kevin J. Kurtz and Ricky Templin, who were in favor of the project, agreed to allow the turbine within 20 to 25 feet of their property lines.

“You haven’t shown a hardship,” zoners Chairman Curtis C. Johnston told Cadmus. “There’s good merit. The other motives are economic.”

He said he would not be surprised if more residents wanted to construct wind turbines. The township does not have an ordinance governing the structures, officials said.

Cadmus showed more than 20 exhibits in a bid to convince the panel. He said the turbine would make little noise, have no impact to property values and would not be as offensive to the neighborhood as a 237-foot radio tower in the area.

Other nearby Homestead Lane residents, Grant R. Henry and Rob Drexel, were not convinced.

“I can’t imagine it won’t make noise that close to my house,” Drexel said.

Drexel and Henry said that they were worried about the safety, noise and aesthetics of the tower.

After a brief recess, the three-member board said it would not grant the variance.

Cadmus said after the meeting that he would get his $6,400 deposit back from the wind turbine company, and probably not try to lobby the township to enact an ordinance.

Source:  By Carole Duran, Reading Eagle correspondent, readingeagle.com 20 October 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky