[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Ethics Commission continues investigation of Councilman Winfield 

Credit:  By JOSEPH R. LaPLANTE, Valley Breeze & Observer Managing Editor, www.valleybreeze.com 13 October 2010 ~~

SCITUATE – The Rhode Island Ethics Commission investigation into Republican Town Council member John F. Winfield Jr.’s alleged failure to recuse himself from council deliberations about a wind turbine proposed in an orchard that abuts his property is ongoing, a spokesman for the agency said Tuesday, Oct. 5.

The complaint was brought by Gloria McConville of 240 Gleaner Chapel Road, owner of Sunset Orchard, who with Wind Energy Development LLC of North Kingstown have applied for a zoning dimensional variance and a special permit to erect a 426-foot-tall wind turbine that would generate income to pay taxes and expenses for the farm.

Winfield and other abutters object to the plan, citing health and safety concerns and a disturbance of the quiet enjoyment of their property.

McConville alleged in a complaint filed July 26:

* On April 22, Linda Winfield, the councilman’s wife, voiced her opposition to a wind turbine process to the council and Councilman Winfield did not recuse himself.

* On April 29 after publicly expressing his opposition to the McConville proposal and after his wife, Linda, opposed the matter Winfield voted in favor of a moratorium on wind turbines until an ordinance is drafted.

* Councilman Winfield sits on the Wind Turbine Study Commission, which is drafting a wind turbine ordinance for the town, and did not recuse himself when he appeared before the commission on June 2, June 16 and July 21.

The Valley Breeze & Observer called Winfield at his business Tuesday afternoon, Oct. 5, for a comment but the answering service said he was not available.

The objections were to a structure as tall as a skyscraper (it would be close to the height of the Bank of America Building in Providence); to concerns about the shadow flicker cast by the turbine blades which some believe could trigger seizures for some people.

Supporters see the turbine as a necessary step toward generating green energy (the electricity would power the farm with the remaining amount sold to National Grid) and an environmentally conscious way to keep a farm in operation.

The probes could take up to 180 days under Ethics Commission regulations.

Source:  By JOSEPH R. LaPLANTE, Valley Breeze & Observer Managing Editor, www.valleybreeze.com 13 October 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon