[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Viking refuse planning extension  

Credit:  Hans J Marter, The Shetland News, www.shetland-news.co.uk 12 October 2010 ~~

Anti-Viking Energy campaign group Sustainable Shetland has hit out at the wind farm developer for refusing to allow an extension to the consultation period following the publication of its planning addendum at the end of last month.

But Viking Energy said they had already added an extra three weeks to the four week statutory period for responses to be submitted.

Sustainable Shetland had put their request through the government’s Energy Consents Unit for the consultation period to be extended to 17 December to allow for scrutiny of the addendum, which has taken a year to produce.

In autumn last year Viking Energy announced that they would carry out further work in response to the widespread criticism levelled at their original planning application for the then 540 megawatt wind farm.

Two weeks ago they published the addendum, now proposing a smaller 457 megawatt development. This triggered a four week consultation period which was extended by the developer until 19 November.

Sustainable Shetland vice chairman Kevin Learmonth said on Monday that the energy consents unit had informed them that Viking Energy had not agreed to an extension.

He said: “In refusing to grant an extension, Viking Energy have signalled their intention to attempt to push this application through with unseemly haste, and force their plans on the people of Shetland.

“Many parts of the addendum refer back to the original planning impact assessment, itself also several hundred pages long.

“To release the revised planning application just as many families begin a two week long October holiday, and with many people away from Shetland, is a cynical and underhand manoeuvre by Viking Energy.”

But Viking co-ordinator Allan Wishart said there was nothing underhand or cynical behind the company’s decision.

“This is a revision of the original document. It is not a full environmental statement. That is why we think, given the two weeks extension, that we have been quite generous. This should be sufficient time for anyone to look through it and submit their comments.”

Shetland Islands Council, as the main statutory consultee, has a further four weeks until 17 December to respond.

Source:  Hans J Marter, The Shetland News, www.shetland-news.co.uk 12 October 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.