LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Firm seeks tax break for wind power plan 

Credit:  By Rich Hewitt, BDN Staff, Bangor Daily News, www.bangordailynews.com 5 October 2010 ~~

ELLSWORTH, Maine – The Hancock County commissioners on Tuesday heard a request from First Wind for tax incentives on its proposed wind power project in a portion of the county’s Unorganized Territory.

According to David Fowler, development manager for First Wind, the project is the first phase of a proposed wind power project on Bull Hill in Eastbrook and on Bull and Heifer hills in Township 16. The first phase would include 19 turbines with a 1.8-megawatt capacity each in the township.

Although permitting for the project falls under the purview of the Maine Land Use Regulation Commission, the county commissioners, as overseers of Unorganized Territory in Hancock County, would be the ones to approve any tax incentive plan for the project.

Joan Fortin, an attorney with Bernstein Shur representing First Wind at Tuesday’s meeting, said the company is proposing a tax increment financing plan for the project.

Tax increment financing is an economic development tool approved by the state that allows municipalities and counties to provide tax incentives for certain projects.

Under a TIF agreement, a portion of the property taxes paid to the state on the land and equipment would be returned to the county. The county then would share those funds with the company based on a negotiated percentage. Provisions in the TIF agreement also would determine how the county and the company could spend the money.

The TIF, according to Fowler, would help the company reduce its costs and could be an incentive to investors interested in backing the project financially.

The law requires that the county’s share of the funds be used for economic development. Although the law provides for a broad range of eligible projects, Fortin said, the funds must be used within the Unorganized Territory.

“That can be challenging,” she said. “On the flip side, however, those funds would go straight to the state and not come back [to the county] without a TIF.”

She noted, however, that the funds would not be limited to Township 16 where the proposed wind power project would be located. The county’s share of the TIF funds, she said, could be used for projects in any of the county’s Unorganized Territory, but could not be allocated for projects in other parts of the county or to reduce county taxes.

The state permitting process also requires wind power developers pay “tangible benefits” to the host community, or in this case the county. The relatively new law requires that the developer provide $4,000 per turbine per year to the host community, according to Fortin.

First Wind would be required to develop a plan with the county commissioners for the allocation of those funds. Although there was some question concerning how those funds could be used, Fortin said she believed they could be used for county projects outside of the Unorganized Territory.

Commissioners took no action on either proposal Tuesday and did not indicate whether they supported the TIF concept. They accepted First Wind’s offer to provide more detailed information on the TIF and tangible benefit process. Fowler said he would like to meet with the commissioners again, possibly in November after the company has submitted its application to LURC. At that time, he said, First Wind could present a TIF proposal to the commissioners as a starting point for negotiations.

If all goes well, Fowler said, the permitting process could be completed late next summer, and construction on the project could begin by this time next year.

Source:  By Rich Hewitt, BDN Staff, Bangor Daily News, www.bangordailynews.com 5 October 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon