[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Hatton turbine plan at airstrip rejected  

Credit:  By Stephen Christie, The Press and Journal, www.pressandjournal.co.uk 6 October 2010 ~~

Residents fighting plans for a windfarm near a Buchan airstrip celebrated last night after the project was thrown out by councillors.

The three 276ft turbines, earmarked for land at Auchenten, near Hatton, prompted over 170 letters from objectors who claimed the masts would have been loud, ugly and could have devalued properties.

Council officials, meanwhile, said the developer behind the scheme, Green Cat Renewables, had failed to show the proposal would not have had a “detrimental impact” on Hatton airstrip.

Pilot Jim Anderson, who has owned the private airstrip for 18 years, said his main argument was the three-bladed turbines would endanger aircraft taking off and landing at Hatton.

Buchan councillors agreed yesterday and refused planning permission.

Mr Anderson, of Ardiffery, near Hatton, said later: “My main concern was for the visiting pilots who would not be familiar with the lie of the land and unaware that a windfarm development was nearby. If the company had proposed it for the other side of the A90 (Aberdeen to Peterhead road) I would have been quite happy.”

Another objector, David Moore, of Moss Croft, near Ellon, hoped the decision would spell the end of a “very stressful year”. He was joined by protesters who shook hands and congratulated one another outside Arbuthnot House, Peterhead, where the meeting took place. Mr Moore said: “This application was totally inappropriate and the decision confirms that.”

Dr Gordon Masson, of Sutton Scotney, Hampshire, was behind the plan and had been working with Green Cat Renewables on the scheme.

At a previous meeting, his agents said he would be willing to pay for the runway to be rerouted so that planes flew away from the turbines.

Mr Anderson refused the offer, saying he had no interest in the money.

Scottish Natural Heritage also criticised the plans, saying thousands of migrating geese, which occupy north-east nature reserves in winter, could be at risk. No one from Green Cat Renewables was available for comment.

Source:  By Stephen Christie, The Press and Journal, www.pressandjournal.co.uk 6 October 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.