[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind turbine on hold  

Credit:  By MICHELLE STEIN, Staff Writer, The Evening Leader, www.theeveningleader.com 27 September 2010 ~~

SPENCERVILLE – Spencerville schools plan to build a wind turbine has temporarily been halted. The Spencerville Board of Zoning Appeals voted 4-1 refusing to grant a variance to zoning regulations, which prevents construction of any structures more than 35 feet tall.
The proposed 750-kilowatt wind turbine would be 335 feet tall and would be located west of the school parking lot.
“Unfortunately, the village made the decision not to give us a variance to build it,” Spencerville Superintendent Joel Hatfield said.
“I just shared the info with the board of education and they will provide me with some direction as to where to go from here.”
Hatfield said there are two likely courses of action the district can take on the matter.
“One is to walk away,” he said. “Another would be to appeal this decision with the Allen County Court of Common Pleas.”
The Spencerville Board of Education has 10 days to decide on a course of action after the Board of Zoning Appeals gave the official decision to the village clerk. A decision should be made by Sept. 30, Hatfield said.
“We’ve been in contact with our attorneys as well as the companies we’ve been working with for the wind power, getting recommendations,” he said.
The plans to build the turbine came about last spring, when Spencerville Schools began partnering with One Energy on the project.
“This is something we’ve been talking about for a while,” Hatfield said.
Saving money is the main reason for wanting to build the turbine.
“Assuming a 20-year life expectancy, which would be a low estimate, it could potentially save the school $1.5 million plus,” Hatfield said. “What we would do, is we would lease it until the cost of turbine was paid for, and then it would be ours. So it’s kind of a lease-to-own deal.”
The turbine would also be a more green energy source.
“We’re hoping it would produce most of our energy needs for the k-12 building,” he said.
The primary opponent is the land owner on two sides of the school, in the area where the turbine would be built, Hatfield said.

Source:  By MICHELLE STEIN, Staff Writer, The Evening Leader, www.theeveningleader.com 27 September 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.