[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Fresh action against Hayes 

Credit:  By JOHN EDENS - The Southland Times, www.stuff.co.nz 25 September 2010 ~~

Opponents of the $2 billion Project Hayes wind farm have filed notice to take the case to the Court of Appeal.

In August the High Court upheld an appeal by Meridian Energy over its planned 176-turbine Project Hayes wind farm in Central Otago.

The 63-page decision by Justices Lester Chisholm and John Fogarty called for reconsideration by the Environment Court, which cancelled consents for the proposed farm on the remote Lammermoor Range last year.

An Environment Court hearing to decide the time frame and order of appearance for the rethink was set down for November 15 in Dunedin.

However, the notice of appeal, if granted, means the Environment Court hearing could be put on hold pending a decision by the Court of Appeal.

Lobby group Save Central filed leave to appeal by the Maniototo Environmental Society, Upland Landscape Protection Society, John and Sue Douglas, of Alexandra, and Ewan Carr on September 13.

If granted, the applicants can decide to take the case to appeal or continue with the Environment Court re-hearing.

Save Central coordinator Graye Shattky said the umbrella group filed the notices to protect its options for going either way.

Meridian objected to the Environment Court’s original decision that a project such as Hayes should demonstrate how it was economically better than any other potential generation scheme and consider alternative sites.

High Court documents say the applications to appeal were based on points of law, including whe-ther the Environment Court erred when it called for analyses of alternative sites; whether alternative sites should be limited to Central Otago and whether it was wrong to call for explicit cost-benefit studies.

The notice also sought an extension of the appeal time slot and said questions of law were of public importance.Justices Chisholm and Fogarty’s decision said the energy firm was not obliged to go beyond a “reasonably detailed” description of alternative sites in Central Otago.

They rejected the ruling that said Meridian must show how the Lammermoor site was best and stipulated nine points for the Environment Court rethink.

A Meridian Energy spokeswoman yesterday said the firm was unable to comment while the case was before the courts.

Source:  By JOHN EDENS - The Southland Times, www.stuff.co.nz 25 September 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky