[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Flood group joins anti-windfarm campaign  

Credit:  By Adam Hewitt, The Reading Chronicle, www.readingchronicle.co.uk 23 September 2010 ~~

An Earley flood awareness campaign group has come out against the windfarm planned for south of the M4.

The four turbines at Rushy Mead, off Cutbush Lane, have prompted concerns from some about their visual or possible noise impact, but Loddon Valley Residents’ Association (LVRA) is most concerned about building on a flood plain. Phiala Mehring, from the association, said: “LVRA are actively trying to prevent this development from happening as it is located on the flood plain.

“Are we the only ones to see this as being perverse, building on a flood plain when we already have a flooding problem?”

Households Against Rushy Mead (Harm), which campaigns against the turbines, last week invited leading energy consultant Michael Jefferson to address a public meeting at Bearwood Theatre.

Mr Jefferson backs wind energy, but only in the right places – and he told the audience that siting turbines near houses in central England provoked “needless antagonism”, cost a fortune in subsidies and produced relatively little electricity.

Harm co-ordinator, Jan Heard, said: “Green Park is one of the least productive turbines in the UK, and to build a further four or six would be an expensive and unnecessary mistake.”

Mr Jefferson, a former senior manager at Shell and deputy secretary general of the World Energy Council, produced figures showing that of 104 onshore wind turbine sites in England, Green Park is down at 90th, running at just 15.3% of its capacity.

Windfarm developer Partnership For Renewables says the site is “environmentally appropriate” and expects to submit a planning application soon.

Source:  By Adam Hewitt, The Reading Chronicle, www.readingchronicle.co.uk 23 September 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.