LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind turbine proposal finding support in Bingham 

Credit:  By ERIN RHODA Morning Sentinel, www.pressherald.com 20 September 2010 ~~

BINGHAM – In the coming years, people driving on Route 16 may pass a wind turbine on Johnson Mountain.

If all goes according to plan, it would be one of up to 35 turbines installed along the ridgeline between that point and Blanchard Township, more than 30 miles northeast. The spot in Bingham is about two miles from the nearest year-round residence, said Selectman Steven Steward.

One company, First Wind, wants to develop the area’s wind resource and is starting to gather wind data. Discussions with Bingham selectmen are beginning, and Somerset County commissioners will meet with representatives of First Wind on Wednesday, Oct. 6.

One wind testing tower, called a meteorological pole, is currently in place in the northeast corner of Bingham. There are four in Mayfield Township, and the company recently received approval to erect a tower in Kingsbury Plantation, according to John Lamontagne, director of corporate communications for First Wind.

“We haven’t determined where the turbines could be placed, but one location under consideration is Johnson Mountain,” Lamontagne said.

The project would likely cost millions of dollars, but it is premature to set a specific amount now, Lamontagne said.

“We can say that the Stetson I project in Danforth featured 38 turbines and cost about $130 million. This also included the construction of a 38-mile transmission line, which would not be included in the Bingham project,” he said.

So far, Bingham selectmen appear to favor the project. “We’re listening to all options and all sides. The location is ideal. There’s nothing up there,” Steward said.

“I definitely think, where it’s going to be located, there should be no problem at all. I’m all for it, 100 percent. We need new tax revenue in town; we need new electricity,” Selectman Larry Malloy said.

First Wind is responsible for Stetson Wind, a utility-scale wind farm in Washington County. Steward said some selectmen visited the Stetson project and found that sound was not an issue.

“Two hundred yards, we could barely hear them. Two miles away, if someone can hear them, they’ve got supersonic hearing,” Steward said.

There is the potential for the project to benefit the area, he said, through short-term construction jobs and an improved tax base. “We’ll benefit from it, no doubt in my mind. It’s how we work the deal,” he said.

Steward said a tax increment financing district may be arranged and would need approval by residents. In that instance, the developer would pool some of its property taxes in a fund for the town’s economic development projects. The developer would also receive a portion.

Alan Michka is a resident of Lexington Township and is chairman of the board of Friends of the Highland Mountains, which was formed in opposition to a proposed 48-turbine wind-generation project west of Moscow, in Highland Plantation. He said that at this stage, people in Bingham should be concerned about not having a turbine-related ordinance.

They should be concerned, he said, about not having a decommissioning policy, which would prevent the town from incurring the expense of removing the turbines if the developer ever goes bankrupt, or the project fails in some way.

“I would suggest that the people of Bingham, since they do have the power, consider that, and make sure the money is fully there, up front, before the place even starts to operate,” he said.

Source:  By ERIN RHODA Morning Sentinel, www.pressherald.com 20 September 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon