LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Phillips approves new wind power ordinance 

Credit:  By Ben Hanstein, Daily Bulldog, www.dailybulldog.com 16 September 2010 ~~

PHILLIPS – Voters approved a new wind power ordinance at a special town meeting Thursday evening, seeking to regulate the placement of turbines near residences.

The ordinance, titled “Wind Energy Facility Ordinance,” includes several months of research and work by the town’s planning board, who sought expert opinions on a variety of issues revolving around wind power development, including environmental, visual and acoustic impact.

“We believe it covers the complete range of equipment in use,” Planning Board Chair Kenneth Ziglar said, “from personal to a multi-kilowatt generator.”

The ordinance includes a series of acoustic formulas, designed to regulate how far a turbine, making noise of a certain volume, can be placed near another resident’s property line. The formula, which planning board members noted was “conservative,” includes modifiers for atmospheric variation, errors in measurement and the number of turbines. The formula, which was developed by Robert Rand, an acoustic engineer, yields setbacks of 211 feet, for an extremely quiet turbine at 70 decibels, to setbacks of 37,584 feet, for a turbine operating at 115 decibels.

The formula is designed to prevent a resident from being exposed to constant, low frequency sounds of 30 decibels or higher which, the planning board said their research into the subject indicates, can cause sleep deprivation in some people. In addition to the formula, there are maximum acoustic cutoffs of 30 decibels at property lines and structures, as a back up.

Due to the size of Phillips, a multi-turbine project operating at an industrial level would effectively require waivers from a large percentage of residents. Some at the meeting noted that the ordinance would likely prevent any such project’s developer from choosing Phillips.

“You’re being overly conservative,” one resident said.

Ziglar and other planning board members agreed that a large-scale project would be a difficult fit in Phillips under the new ordinance. However, they pointed to sound as the most significant limiting factor, noting that smaller turbines, or next generation turbines that produce less noise, still could have a place in town.

“We would like industrial developments of any kind, although this ordinance deals with wind power,” Planning Board member Dain Trafton said, “to come here the right way.”

The ordinance also includes environmental requirements, a process for developers to follow and a process in which property owners can waive acoustic-related setbacks through a covenant between both owners and the town.

The final vote on the ordinance was 32 to 9, in favor of its passage. It ends a six-month moratorium on wind power projects in Phillips, enacted earlier this year to give the board time to develop the ordinance.

[Click here to download a copy of the ordinance.]

Source:  By Ben Hanstein, Daily Bulldog, www.dailybulldog.com 16 September 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon