[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

PUC urged to dismiss controversial power line through Hill Country  

Credit:  By Candace Velvin, Managing Editor, boernestar.com ~~

Hill Country lawmakers are urging the Public Utility Commission to dismiss another controversial power transmission line while the agency that manages the state’s electricity grid determines if the new lines are needed to transmit wind-generated power across the state as mandated by the legislature.

At a meeting in Austin Wednesday, Sept. 15, the PUC will consider dismissing the proposed McKamey D-to-Kendall-to-Gillespie line pending further studies on whether existing lines can be used rather than building new lines.

Landowners, local governments and Hill County preservation groups such as Clear View Alliance say the proposed new transmission line’s 180-foot-tall towers will devalue Hill Country property, deface the landscape, threaten wildlife habitat and hurt the economy.

While the lines are designed to meet a state legislative mandate to transmit wind-generated power 2,400 miles from West Texas to under-served urban areas, Hill Country lawmakers responding to the concerns of landowners have sent letters urging the PUC to either review the entire Competitive Renewable Energy Zone (CREZ) program or stop the process and allow the legislature to address the unforeseen issues the mandate has caused.

Proposed routes for the McKamey D-to-Kendall-to-Gillespie transmission line were submitted to the PUC July 28 by the Lower Colorado River Authority Transmission Services Corporation (LCRA TSC).

Since then, 1,018 interveners have opposed the project. Two groups of interveners have filed motions to dismiss the case on grounds cited by PUC staff in a brief recommending dismissal.

After the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) said the 85-mile Gillespie-Newton transmission line was unnecessary because existing lines could be improved for $97 million less than building the proposed new lines, PUC Chairman Barry Smitherman ordered a similar analysis of the McCamey D-to-Kendall-to-Gillespie line on Aug. 26.

Because the ERCOT study of the Newton-Gillespie line required 12 weeks and Jan. 27, 2011 is the statutory deadline for a PUC decision on a route, the PUC staff recommended the McKamey D-to-Kendall-to-Gillespie transmission line case be dismissed without prejudice to allow ERCOT time to complete its analysis and to prevent the parties to the case from having to expend additional time and resources on litigation, according to a brief filed Sept. 8.

After hearing opposition from 40 Comfort area landowners, State Sen. Jeff Wentworth (R-San Antonio) wrote the PUC in July, urging it to stop the contentious process and let the legislature address it in the upcoming session.

State Rep. Doug Miller (R-New Braunfels) has also been corresponding with the PUC on behalf of constituents opposed to the CREZ lines, his chief of staff, Fritz Reinig, said.

Noting that the ERCOT report “brought into question the necessity and economic justifiability of the McCamey D-Kendall-Gillespie route, as well,” State Rep. Harvey Hilderbran (R-Kerrville) urged the PUC to dismiss the McCamey D-to-Kendall-to-Gillespie CREZ line in a letter dated Sept. 7.

State Sen. Troy Fraser (R-Horseshoe Bay) also called for a review of the entire CREZ system.

“The PUC and ERCOT need to assure all Hill Country residents that existing transmission lines are being fully utilized before adding more transmission projects in the Hill Country,” Hildebran wrote.

“I am requesting that ERCOT reexamine and update the Long-Term System Assessment (LTSA) to determine the need for any or all of the proposed CREZ projects before erecting CREZ lines that will cause great harm to the Hill Country,” he said. “Modernizing existing lines is more environmentally sound, it protects Hill Country landowners, and it’s less expensive than the alternative.”

Source:  By Candace Velvin, Managing Editor, boernestar.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.