[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Ashfield tries to get ahead of windmill issue  

Credit:  By Diane Broncaccio, Recorder Staff, The Recorder, 11 September 2010 ~~

ASHFIELD – With a few wind-turbine proposals in the air – and prospects that a state wind-energy siting reform bill may resurface – the Selectboard wants to create an advisory board to research siting criteria pertinent to Ashfield.

“Our whole plan is to stay ahead of the curve,” said Selectboard Chairman R. Dave DeHerdt. “We anticipate there will be (wind-turbine) applications, and we need to be ready. There will be engineering costs that the Planning Board will have to assess the applicants, because the Planning Board doesn’t have the expertise to do the engineering assessments.”

In July, two wind-turbine proposals surfaced, galvanizing both opponents and proponents in town. One proposal, by Clear Sky Energy LLC of Barnstable, called for four to eight wind-turbines, about 400 feet tall, to be built on Ridge Hill, between Ashfield Mountain and Baptist Corner Road. An informational meeting held on that proposal drew an audience of at least 100 people. So far, there was one public discussion, but no specific proposal has surfaced.

Another proposal, which went through the Planning Board, was for a special permit to install a 160-foot anemometer on land off Cape Street owned by the Mark Leue family to collect and transmit wind data to the University of Massachusetts’ Wind Energy Center. After 15 months of data collection, if wind conditions on the 1,700-foot-high plateau are suitable for electricity generation, the nonprofit ECHO for Sustainable Development of Springfield may propose a turbine project on or near that property. After two nights of public hearings, the Planning Board unanimously granted a special permit for the anemometer.

However, Savino J. and Marguerite Basile of Cape Street, abutting property owner, have appealed the Planing Board decision, based in part on the fact that the town does not have special permitting criteria for either meteorological towers or for wind turbines in the “rural, residential and agricultural” zoning district. The appeal was filed July 30.

The Selectboard is also looking at setting up a “wind energy-siting bylaw committee” to propose a bylaw on wind-turbine siting that could eventually be brought to town meeting for a vote. But the board is also concerned about how to establish such a Committee, considering how contentious the issue of wind turbines has become.

DeHerdt pointed out that any town bylaw regarding wind-turbine siting would have to hold up in court; he said the laws cannot be written in such a way as to make wind-turbine siting impossible.

He said it’s likely that the Legislature will again be looking at statewide wind-energy siting bills then it resumes session in January. He said having residents with knowledge and experience with the issue would be an asset.

Resident Paulette Leukhardt suggested that town officials look at other wind-siting bylaws in other towns. Hawley has a Wind Facility Bylaw that was approved in 2005 and which restricts wind-turbine height to 200 feet.

Source:  By Diane Broncaccio, Recorder Staff, The Recorder, 11 September 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.