[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind lines questioned  

Credit:  By Kevin Welch, Amarillo Globe-News, amarillo.com 11 September 2010 ~~

Gray County Commissioners are asking to be heard by the Public Utility Commission on Wednesday.

The route for a wind-energy transmission line from near Childress to the Lefors area that resulted from an agreement among the commission, the builder and landowners crosses through lesser prairie-chicken habitat, posing a risk of federal curtailment of all sorts of economic activity.

“It hasn’t been classified as endangered, but it’s No. 2 on the list,” said Gray County Judge Richard Peet.

He wrote a letter filed at the PUC Tuesday that says Cross Texas Transmission, the builder and operator of the line, may not have followed proper procedure by not consulting with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in reference to the endangered whooping crane that also can be found seasonally in the county.

County commissioners also filed a resolution asking for a different transmission-line route to avoid prairie-chicken habitat.

“We want them to sit down at the table and negotiate instead of just saying that’s the way it is,” Peet said.

“We want the power line. The people of Gray County want it.”

But the case has gone through months of hearings and evidentiary filings in Austin and consultations with various agencies.

“Cross Texas has followed all the required procedures and consulted with federal, state and local agencies,” said Cameron Fredkin, director of project development for the company. ”

There was a settlement between PUC staff, intervenors and Cross Texas. It will be up to the commissioners to decide the route.”

PUC commissioners meet Wednesday, and approval of a route is on their agenda.

Typically, they don’t take further comment at that point.

“Only if commissioners allow it,” said PUC spokesman Terry Hadley. “The contested case record is already closed.”

The urgency and lateness of the county’s effort is driven by its concern that federal intervention could bring too many constraints.

“At the time, it wasn’t really brought out how high a level (the prairie-chicken) was getting to for being declared endangered,” Peet said.

As evidence and testimony was offered since May in the case, the Texas Parks & Wildlife Department registered agreement the settled route followed an existing transmission line through the habitat. That is one way to lessen the impact of the new line.

“The concerns from the county are actually addressed,” Fredkin said.

A letter filed with the PUC by Clayton Wolf, director of wildlife at TPWD, notes the prairie-chicken has become more likely to be listed as endangered due to current or expected wind energy development and conservation reserve program land going back into crop production.

Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts Susan Combs weighed in with concerns about economic impacts.

“There is some research and evidence in other states indicating prairie chickens will avoid vertical structures such as transmission towers,” she wrote in a letter to the PUC.

“If the LPC is listed as endangered before the lines are complete, transmission routes through habitat areas could experience delays in construction or increased cost as a result of this additional regulation.”

Peet still hopes for a chance to address the commission.

“I don’t know if we could have a strong impact. It may be too late,” he said. “But to use the pun, we want to let them know we haven’t blown away.”

Source:  By Kevin Welch, Amarillo Globe-News, amarillo.com 11 September 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.