LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME



[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind energy plans must weather public debate 

Credit:  The Times Herald, www.thetimesherald.com 10 September 2010 ~~

Let’s have an open discussion and debate about all aspects of wind energy, the good, if any, as well as the bad. Our leaders should be looking at more than just the tax dollars they are eagerly anticipating.

Why are our Republican leaders so willing to jump on board Gov. Jennifer Granholm’s windy dream? What will thousands of turbines and new transmission lines do to our landscape, our farm fields, our wildlife, our residential properties, our families and our children?

The next time you drive to Bay City, take a good look at the transmission lines crossing M-25 and then imagine that landscape filled with wind turbines. Is this what we really want?

The cost for wind energy development comes from our pockets via our tax dollars and our utility bills. No company would invest in these turbines if not for the perks – the tax credits, the carbon credits and the subsidies – or if it wasn’t mandated by tax and spend politicians.

The landowners allowing these turbines on their property will receive payments to ease the loss of precious agricultural land, increased utility rates and crop production decreases. Their neighbors, on the other hand, will pay increased utility rates while they watch the value of their home decrease. Given a choice, who will purchase a home next to a wind turbine?

LOUIS J. COLLETTA

Port Austin, Sept. 3

Source:  The Times Herald, www.thetimesherald.com 10 September 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky