[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Oklahoma panel studies lesser prairie chicken habitat  

Credit:  By TIM TALLEY, The Associated Press, www.washingtonpost.com 9 September 2010 ~~

OKLAHOMA CITY – Conservationists and wind power developers told a legislative panel on Thursday that more study is needed to determine the impact of wind turbines and electrical transmission lines on the habitat of the lesser prairie chicken.

The state is on target to become the nation’s top producer of wind-generated electricity by 2016, Rep. Gus Blackwell, R-Goodwell, told members of the House Wildlife Committee. But development would be threatened if loss of habitat forced the government to place the lesser prairie chicken on the endangered species list, Blackwell said.

Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation wildlife biologist Russ Horton said the number of birds in the state is not known but that there are far fewer in their historic habitat in northwestern Oklahoma and the Oklahoma Panhandle than there were in the 1960s.

“The long-term trend is a decline,” Horton said. “If things don’t turn around we’re potentially looking at that listing.”

The lesser prairie chicken is a stocky, ground-dwelling bird found in parts of New Mexico, Colorado, Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas. Horton said Kansas has more of the birds than the other four states combined and is the only state that still has a hunting season for the lesser prairie chicken.

The bird’s natural habitat is prairie grasslands and they avoid vertical structures like wind turbines and transmission lines that might provide shelter to hawks and other predators.

Greg Adams of Harper County, who operates a wind energy consulting firm, said the impact of wind development needs to be studied further. Adams said he has seen lesser prairie chickens gather beneath wind turbines, which he said hawks avoid because of their massive spinning blades.

Oklahoma Gas and Electric Co., Oklahoma’s largest electrical utility, has donated about $8 million to help the wildlife conservation agency mitigate the loss of habitat caused by the development of two wind farms in northwestern Oklahoma. The money was used to purchase privately owned land nearby for new habitat.

In all, about $23.5 million has been spent in the last five years to protect the lesser prairie chicken in the state, according to Horton.

Conservationists said land purchases that permanently protect the bird’s habitat and private landowners who create habitat on their property could help increase the bird’s numbers and keep if off of the endangered species list.

“If it is listed as an endangered species, nobody wins,” said Clay Pope, executive director of the Oklahoma Association of Conservation Districts.

But Adams and other developers said costs that drive up the price tag for wind farms may force them to build in another state, including Texas. Currently, there are no rules requiring wind energy developers to pay mitigation costs to protect lesser prairie chicken habitat, officials said.

Shawn Lepard of Novus Windpower said his company is planning a $750 million, 320 megawatt wind farm south of Guymon in the Oklahoma Panhandle on a site that includes lesser prairie chicken habitat. It would cost $9 million to mitigate the loss of the habitat, a cost financiers may not pay, Lepard said.

Richard Hatcher, director of the Department of Wildlife Conservation, said his agency wants to work with developers and encourage them to invest in the state.

“There is a partnership developing,” Hatcher said. “We are not trying to push anybody out of Oklahoma.”

Source:  By TIM TALLEY, The Associated Press, www.washingtonpost.com 9 September 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.