[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

County gets say in MSTI location 

Credit:  By Nick Gevock of The Montana Standard, www.mtstandard.com 9 September 2010 ~~

BOULDER – A judge ordered state officials here Wednesday to meet with Jefferson County commissioners to give them a say in where a proposed major power line should be built within the county.

Judge Loren Tucker said the state Department of Environmental Quality hadn’t done enough to let county officials give input on the best route for the controversial Mountain States Transmission Intertie, or MSTI, power line. The NorthWestern Energy 500kV line has been in the planning stage for over three years.

“DEQ has concluded and insisted that Jefferson County should be kept out of the process for a certain period of time,” Tucker said in Boulder district court with more than 40 people in the room. “Jefferson County should have ample time to consider all of the data.”

The ruling was a major victory for the county.

Commissioners sued DEQ this year to try to force the agency to sit down and listen to their concerns over where the line should go. They asked for an injunction that would halt the line until the county is consulted.

State officials at the time said they had tried to involve commissioners as much as possible. Lawyers for DEQ and NorthWestern Wednesday reiterated those arguments, saying the county knew of the line three years ago and submitted comments during the “scoping period” for the environmental impact statement.

“They imply that they’ve been blindsided by the project – that somebody came to them on Aug. 8, 2008, and said ‘Here’s this huge project,'” said John Tabaracci, a lawyer representing NorthWestern. “The fact is they were consulted a year and three months before that.”

Ed Hayes, DEQ attorney, said the agency accepted comments from the county both before and well after the two-month scoping period in 2008. He argued Jefferson County was given ample opportunity to comment and did so.

But Peter Scott, a Helena lawyer hired by Jefferson County, said scoping is merely used to identify the issues surrounding a project. He said the real input needs to come in planning the route for a line, of which Jefferson County was completely shut out.

“Scoping cannot satisfy the requirement to consult: in order for that to occur you have to know what the impacts are,” Scott said. “The scoping notice does not say this will be the only opportunity that Jefferson County has to sit down with DEQ face to face and identify the issues it may have.”

And state law requires that state officials consult with cooperating agencies, including local governments, Scott said.

Tucker agreed. He said while he rejected the county’s view that scoping provides no significant input, the law doesn’t set parameters about when an agency must consult with local governments. Tucker added his ruling in favor of the county was due to DEQ’s position that it is not required to consult with local governments while planning, which he said is contrary to state law.

“The Legislature clearly set out that a county’s opinion is to be considered,” he said. “There is an ongoing duty to consult.”

Jefferson County Attorney Matt Johnson said the ruling is a victory for county and city governments statewide.

“State agencies will have to include local governments far more during the drafting of an EIS,” he said.

Source:  By Nick Gevock of The Montana Standard, www.mtstandard.com 9 September 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky