[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

ERCA urges ‘step back’ on turbines fight 

Credit:  By Sharon Hill, The Windsor Star, www.windsorstar.com 9 September 2010 ~~

Five kilometres may not be far enough away from the shore for wind turbines in the lakes, says the local conservation authority’s submission to the provincial government.

“Let’s take a step back and get the research and studies underway,” Essex Region Conservation Authority general manager Richard Wyma said Wednesday. “Is five kilometres enough? We don’t necessarily believe it will be.”

A report to the ERCA board tonight summarizes ERCA’s response to a Ministry of the Environment’s proposed five-kilometre exclusion zone for offshore wind turbines. Wyma said the ERCA response doesn’t suggest how far the turbines should be from the shoreline because more research is needed on the impact. The response says five kilometres should be the “absolute minimum.”

The Essex Region Source Protection Committee has told the province it wants the offshore wind turbines to be bumped out eight kilometres offshore to protect water intake pipes.

Committee chairman Tom Fuerth said eight kilometres is about what the setback would be on the Ohio side for proposed offshore turbines, is close to one of the protection zones around intake pipes for local water treatment plants and would allow more room if intake pipes have to be moved.

Earlier this year SouthPoint Wind proposed building the 15-turbine project off Kingsville and Leamington and another 700 turbines in lakes Erie and St. Clair, including turbines that would be less than 1.5 kilometres from shore. The Leamington company proposed putting 165 turbines in Lake St. Clair and the rest in 10 wind farms of 55 turbines each off the southern shore of Essex County and Chatham-Kent.

Some residents expressed their concern over the offshore turbines at a series of meetings held across Essex County in March.

SouthPoint Wind didn’t return requests to comment Wednesday on the proposed exclusion zone.

ERCA’s submission says a “blanket five-kilometre exclusion zone from the shoreline for all offshore areas of the Great Lakes System may not be sufficient in many cases based on the unique issues and constraints associated with each of the Great Lakes.”

And the conservation authority has suggested the province work with the U.S. to consider the cumulative impacts of all turbines on the Great Lakes.

Kingsville and Leamington hired a consultant and also sent in comments by Tuesday’s deadline. Kingsville asked that no reduction to the five-kilometre exclusion zone be considered and that the proponent be made to do more site-specific studies such as lakebed sampling to establish contaminant levels.

Now ERCA, the municipalities and the general public can comment until Oct. 4 to the Ministry of Natural Resources on where, when and how the province will make Crown land available for offshore turbines. The Environmental Registry (ebr.gov.on.ca) is accepting comments on criteria that could limit future development of offshore turbines in areas such as navigational lanes, core commercial fishing areas, sensitive environmental and ecological areas and spots with important recreational activities.

Source:  By Sharon Hill, The Windsor Star, www.windsorstar.com 9 September 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky