[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Ordinance to address wind energy facilities  

Credit:  Melinda Williams, Staff Writer, The Southwest Times, www.southwesttimes.com 31 August 2010 ~~

Pulaski County has enacted what may be the first ordinance in Virginia to regulate the construction, operation and decommissioning of large wind energy facilities.

Kevin Byrd, executive director of New River Valley Planning District Commission, told members of the Pulaski County Board of Supervisors the county already has an ordinance to regulate small wind energy facilities. However, he said the new Wind Energy Facility Ordinance for larger facilities is possibly the first one in the state.
The purpose of the ordinance is to regulate large wind energy facilities to “promote and protect the public health, safety and welfare, while encouraging renewable energy development and deployment within the county.”
Community Development Director Shaun Utt said the PDC and Pulaski County Planning Commission have spent several months developing the ordinance, which will be incorporated into the Pulaski County Zoning Ordinance.
The wind ordinance addresses permit acquisition, wind turbine design and installation, setback and zoning district requirements, sound limitations, liability and decommissioning of facilities no longer in use.
The ordinance applies to four types of wind energy turbine facilities:
• Small: a single tower with a total capacity of 20 kilowatts (kW) or less and no more than 60 feet in height. Carries a $150 permit fee.
• Medium: one or more wind turbine towers with a total capacity of 20-100 kW and no more than 150 feet tall. Carries a $300 permit fee.
• Large: one or more wind turbine towers with a total capacity of more than 100 kW. No height limitations are addressed for large facilities, but Byrd said he has heard of towers up to 400 feet in height. Carries a $2,500 permit fee.
• Temporary meteorological (met) towers: These towers are constructed at potential wind energy facility sites in order to assess wind resources available at the site and collect meteorological data. Permitted by right for two years, these towers are limited to a height of 198 feet. Carries a $25 permit fee.
The ordinance allows wind turbines of all types in every zoning district, but some require a special use permit in certain districts.
Small facilities are permitted by right in Agriculture A-1; Commercial CM-1; Rural R-1and RR, and Industrial I-1 districts.
Medium facilities are permitted by right in A-1 and I-1 districts, and temporary met towers are permitted in A-1, C-1, CM-1, R-1, RR and I-1 districts. A special use permit is required for all large facilities, regardless of zoning district.
The supervisors voted to make several changes to the draft ordinance presented to the board.
First, setbacks from adjacent property lines were made the same for properties with occupied buildings and those without occupied buildings.
Setback requirements were proposed to be less stringent if adjacent properties did not have occupied buildings.
The supervisors felt this could infringe upon the rights of those property owners should they decide to construct a building after the turbine facility was already in place.
If you’re going to build a 230-foot tower you should be at least that far from the property line, not just 150 feet,” said Ingles District Supervisor Ranny Akers. Otherwise “it’s infringing on another person’s property rights, and if it falls, it’s on someone else’s property.”
Being a former law enforcement officer, Akers said he is aware that tree limbs growing over property lines cause enough problems without having towers compound the issue.
The other draft change concerned the amount of liability insurance required to cover bodily injury and property damage. The supervisors instructed county staff to reduce the amount of coverage required for small and medium facilities. $5 million had been proposed for all facilities, but the supervisors felt that amount was too high for small and medium turbines.

Source:  Melinda Williams, Staff Writer, The Southwest Times, www.southwesttimes.com 31 August 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.